Ferenc Feher, Richard Sebok and the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers et al (applicants) v. the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (respondent)
paragraph 112(2) (b.1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27, is declared to be inconsistent with subsection 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11, insofar as it concerns nationals of countries designated pursuant to section 109.1(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act; and the following words - “or, in the case of a person who is a national of a country that is designated under subsection 109.1(1), less than 36 months,” - in paragraph 112(2) (b.1) shall have no force or effect with respect to such nationals;
20 March 2019
| Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court
| Document type: Case Law
| Topic(s):
Constitutional law
- Equality before the law
- Safe country of origin
| Countries:
Canada
- Hungary
|
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. (Petitioner(s))
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Respondent(s))
insofar as Section 377 criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults (i.e. persons above the age of 18 years who are competent to consent) in private, is violative of Articles 14, 15,19, and 21 of the Constitution.
It is, however, clarified that such consent must
be free consent, which is completely voluntary
in nature, and devoid of any duress or coercion.
6 September 2018
| Judicial Body: India: Supreme Court
| Document type: Case Law
| Topic(s):
Constitutional law
- Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI)
- Sexual and reproductive rights
| Countries:
India
|