Last Updated: Tuesday, 06 June 2023, 11:08 GMT

Human rights / Human rights activists

Filter:
Showing 1-10 of 10 results
RRT Case No. 0908471

17 December 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Human rights activists - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Persecution based on political opinion - Political parties - Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) | Countries: Australia - Iran, Islamic Republic of

RRT Case No. 0903537

30 July 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Gender-based persecution - Human rights activists - Muslim - Opposition - Persecution based on political opinion - Social group persecution - Women-at-risk | Countries: Australia - Iran, Islamic Republic of

RRT Case No. 0902971

2 July 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Country of origin information (COI) - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Human rights activists - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Persecution based on political opinion - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Right to education - Right to employment - Shia - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - Bahrain

RRT Case No. 0807987

9 June 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Human rights activists - Persecution based on political opinion - Racial / Ethnic persecution - Soyot | Countries: Australia - Russian Federation

RRT Case No. 0900574

22 April 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Child labour - Children's rights - Credibility assessment - Human rights activists - Persecution based on political opinion | Countries: Australia - India

RRT Case No. 0805238

18 December 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Human rights activists - Opposition - Persecution based on political opinion - Political parties - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - Cameroon

RRT Case No. 0804436

15 October 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Human rights activists - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) - Persecution on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity - Social group persecution - State protection | Countries: Australia - Ukraine

RRT Case No. 0803018

18 September 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Human rights activists - Passports - Persecution based on political opinion | Countries: Australia - Korea, Republic of

RRT Case No. 071910232

22 February 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Country of origin information (COI) - Human rights activists - Persecution based on political opinion - Sexual and reproductive rights - Witnesses | Countries: Australia - China

Vietnam: 1. Are you aware of any monitoring activity by Vietnamese Embassies and Consulates of expatriate Vietnamese and Vietnamese citizens travelling or residing abroad? 2. How are Vietnamese citizens who have been involved in anti-regime activity overseas and who have been critical of the Vietnamese regime treated on return by the Government? Does this also apply to failed asylum seekers, and would the authorities? reaction be any different in these circumstances? 3. Are you aware of any reports of prosecution of returned asylum seekers by the Vietnamese authorities on the grounds that they sought asylum in Australia? 4. What is the current level of press censorship and freedom of speech in Vietnam? 5. What is the nature of the relationship between the press and Government in Vietnam? 6. How are people who have criticised the regime (for example, via internet or distribution of pamphlets) or have expressed anti-regime political views in Vietnam treated by the Government? 7. How are religious group leaders, who are perceived by the authorities as having become too political, treated by the authorities, e.g. Buddhist leaders, or other religious group leaders e.g. Protestant groups or those in so-called "home-based religions"? 8. Do local authorities at times act arbitrarily at the local level regardless of directions from the central authority?

24 March 2005 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld