Human rights / Children's rights
|
A,B, and C v. the Swedish Migration Agency
In an overall assessment of the exceptional circumstances in A's case and with special regard to her very strong connection to Sweden, the Court considers that her best interests outweigh the opposing interests of the State. An expulsion of A to Lebanon can therefore not be consid-ered proportionate and would thus be in violation of the CRC. A is therefore granted a residence permit in Sweden. B and C are granted residence permits as it would be in violation of Article 8 of the ECHR to separate the family. 22 December 2020 | Judicial Body: Sweden: Migration Court of Appeal (Migrationsöverdomstolen) | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Children's rights - Right to family life | Countries: Lebanon - Sweden |
|
AATA Case No. 1512282
11 April 2016 | Judicial Body: Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal | Topic(s): 1951 Refugee Convention - Children's rights - Credibility assessment - Social group discrimination - Social group persecution - Transgression of social / cultural norms | Countries: Australia - Lebanon |
|
EM (Lebanon) (FC) (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the
Home Department (Respondent)
On appeal from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales): [2006]EWCA Civ 153. 22 October 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee) | Topic(s): Children's rights - Deportation / Forcible return - Domestic violence - Right to family life | Countries: Lebanon - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
