United States Board of Immigration Appeals

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) is the highest administrative body for interpreting and applying immigration laws. It is composed of 11 Board Members, including the Chairman and Vice Chairman who share responsibility for Board management. The Board is located at EOIR headquarters in Falls Church, Virginia. Generally, the Board does not conduct courtroom proceedings - it decides appeals by conducting a "paper review" of cases. On rare occasions, however, the Board does hear oral arguments of appealed cases, predominately at headquarters. Website: www.usdoj.gov/eoir/biainfo.htm

Narrow results by
Type
Country
Type
- Type
- Country

Case Law 6

Selected filters: Non-state agents of persecution

Filter:

Showing 1-6 of 6 results

Matter of W-G-R- 7 February 2014 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Gang related violence - Non-state agents of persecution - Social group persecution \| Countries: El Salvador - United States of America
Matter of M-E-V-G- 7 February 2014 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Gang related violence - Non-state agents of persecution - Social group persecution \| Countries: Honduras - United States of America
Matter of E-A-G- 30 July 2008 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Non-state agents of persecution - Social group persecution \| Countries: Honduras - United States of America
In re C-A- (1) The members of a particular social group must share a common, immutable characteristic, which may be an innate one, such as sex, color, or kinship ties, or a shared past experience, such as former military leadership or land ownership, but it must be one that members of the group either cannot change, or should not be required to change, because it is fundamental to their individual identities or consciences. Matter of Acosta, 19 I&N Dec. 211(BIA 1985), followed. (2) The social visibility of the members of a claimed social group is an important consideration in identifying the existence of a 'particular social group' for the purpose of determining whether a person qualifies as a refugee. (3) The group of 'former noncriminal drug informants working against the Cali drug cartel' does not have the requisite social visibility to constitute a 'particular social group.' 15 June 2006 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Non-state agents of persecution - Social group persecution \| Countries: Colombia - United States of America
In Re S-A - 27 June 2000 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Muslim - Non-state agents of persecution - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Women-at-risk \| Countries: Morocco - United States of America
Matter of Vigil Deportation proceedings. 17 March 1988 \| Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Combatants / Former combatants - Deportation / Forcible return - Internal armed conflict - Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription - Non-state agents of persecution - Social group persecution \| Countries: El Salvador - United States of America

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips