Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Yee Chien Woo
Argued: 23 February, 1971; Decided: 21 April, 1971 21 April 1971 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Denial of refugee status - Deportation / Forcible return | Countries: China - United States of America |
Welsh v. United States
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. 15 June 1970 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Countries: United States of America |
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Stanisic
Argued: 25 February, 1969; Decided: 19 May, 1969 19 May 1969 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Denial of refugee status - Refugee seamen | Countries: Serbia - United States of America |
Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Argued: 2 May, 1968; Decided: 10 June, 1968 10 June 1968 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return | Countries: China - United States of America |
Woodby v. Immigration Service
Together with No. 80, Sherman v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, argued on November 16-17, 1966. Argued: November 17, 1966. Decided: December 12, 1966. 12 December 1966 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) | Countries: Poland - United States of America |
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Errico
Argued: 20 October, 1966 Decided together with No. 91, Scott, aka Plummer v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 12 December 1966 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return | Countries: Italy - United States of America |
Aptheker, et al. v. Secretary of State
Argued: 21 April, 1964; Decided: 22 June, 1964 22 June 1964 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Freedom of movement | Countries: United States of America |
United States Attorney General v. Mendoza-Martinez; Secretary of State v. Court on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Argued: 10-11 October, 1961 Decided together with No. 3, Rusk, Secretary of State, v. Cort, on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, argued October 11, 1961, decided in part and set for reargument April 2, 1962, reargued December 4-5, 1962 18 February 1963 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Countries: United States of America |
Dusky v. United States of America
18 April 1960 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) | Countries: United States of America |
Dayton v. Secretary of State
Argued: 10 April, 1958: Decided; 16 June, 1958 16 June 1958 | Judicial Body: United States Supreme Court | Topic(s): Freedom of movement | Countries: United States of America |