Last Updated: Friday, 01 November 2019, 13:47 GMT

UN Human Rights Committee (HRC)

The Human Rights Committee is the body of independent experts that monitors implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by its State parties.

All States parties are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on how the rights are being implemented. States must report initially one year after acceding to the Covenant and then whenever the Committee requests (usually every four years). The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of "concluding observations”.  Website: www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/
Selected filters: Case Law
Filter:
Showing 11-20 of 197 results
X and Y v. Canada

1 December 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Freedom of expression - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Canada - Saudi Arabia

K.A. v. Belarus

25 November 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Freedom of assembly and association | Countries: Belarus

Anatoly Poplavny and Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus

24 November 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Effective remedy - Freedom of assembly and association - Freedom of expression | Countries: Belarus

Mejdoub Chani v. Algeria

12 May 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Exhaustion of domestic remedies - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Right to liberty and security | Countries: Algeria

F.J. et al. v. Australia

asylum seekers’ detention is arbitrary and contrary to their right to liberty if the State fails to demonstrate on an individual basis that their continuous indefinite detention is justified, and that other, less intrusive, measures could not achieve the same end of compliance with the State’s need to respond to security concerns. In addition, the HRC considers that the combination of the arbitrary character and indefinite nature of the authors’ protracted detention, the absence of procedural guarantees to challenge the detention and the difficult conditions of detention, cumulatively inflict serious psychological harm that amount to “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” under the ICCPR.

2 May 2016 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Legal Instrument: 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention | Countries: Afghanistan - Australia - Iran, Islamic Republic of - Sri Lanka

Taras Surgan v. Belarus

19 November 2015 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Exhaustion of domestic remedies - Freedom of assembly and association - Freedom of expression | Countries: Belarus

Dalisa Dovadzija and Sakiba Dovdzija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina

10 November 2015 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Children's rights - Disappeared persons - Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Right to liberty and security - Right to life | Countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina

X v. Denmark

21 October 2015 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) | Countries: Denmark - Iran, Islamic Republic of

Zinaida Yusupova v. Russian Federation

21 October 2015 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Exhaustion of domestic remedies | Countries: Russian Federation

M.T. v. Uzbekistan

21 October 2015 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Freedom of assembly and association - Freedom of expression | Countries: France - Uzbekistan

Search Refworld