Last Updated: Monday, 17 October 2022, 12:22 GMT

UN Committee Against Torture (CAT)

The Committee Against Torture (CAT) is the body of independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by its State parties.

All States parties are obliged to submit regular reports to the Committee on how the rights are being implemented. States must report initially one year after acceding to the Convention and then every four years. The Committee examines each report and addresses its concerns and recommendations to the State party in the form of “concluding observations”.  Website: www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/
Filter:
Showing 1-10 of 19 results
A.A. v. Sweden

20 January 2022 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Christian - Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Afghanistan - Iran, Islamic Republic of - Sweden

A. A. C. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

14 December 2006 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

A. H. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

30 November 2006 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Countries: Azerbaijan - Sweden

Mehdi Zare v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

17 May 2006 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Iran, Islamic Republic of - Sweden

T.A. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

27 May 2005 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Persecution of family members - Refoulement | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

M.M.K. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

18 May 2005 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

Ruben David v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

17 May 2005 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

S.U.A. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

27 November 2004 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

M.A.M. v. Sweden

18 May 2004 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Countries: Bangladesh - Sweden

J.A.G.V. v. Sweden

Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH

18 November 2003 | Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Colombia - Sweden

Search Refworld