Immigration law
- Aliens 241
- Deportation / Forcible return 3,441
- Emigrants 233
- Exceptional leave to remain (ELR) 56
- Exiles 411
- Expulsion 859
- Extradition 681
- Family reunification 692
- Immigrants 581
- Immigration Detention 1,821
- Immigration control after entry 64
- National security / Public order 907
- Passports 738
- Refugee identity documents 334
- Refugee travel documents / CTDs 191
- Residence permits / Residency 1,488
- Travel documents 354
- Visas 1,575
- Work permits 388
|
Dozens of 'terrorists' among Rohingya slated for repatriation, Myanmar official says
8 November 2018 | Publisher: Radio Free Asia | Document type: Country News |
|
K, B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (C-380/17) (request for preliminary ruling)
1. The Court of Justice has jurisdiction, on the basis of Article 267 TFEU, to interpret Article 12(1) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where a national court is called upon to rule on a beneficiary of subsidiary protection’s right to family reunification, if that provision was made directly and unconditionally applicable to such a situation under national law. 2. Article 12(1) of Directive 2003/86 does not preclude national legislation which permits an application for family reunification lodged on behalf of a member of a refugee’s family, on the basis of the more favourable provisions for refugees of Chapter V of that directive, to be rejected on the ground that that application was lodged more than three months after the sponsor was granted refugee status, whilst affording the possibility of lodging a fresh application under a different set of rules provided that that legislation: – lays down that such a ground of refusal cannot apply to situations in which particular circumstances render the late submission of the initial application objectively excusable; – lays down that the persons concerned are to be fully informed of the consequences of the decision rejecting their initial application and of the measures which they can take to assert their rights to family reunification effectively; and – ensures that sponsors recognised as refugees continue to benefit from the more favourable conditions for the exercise of the right to family reunification applicable to refugees, specified in Articles 10 and 11 or in Article 12(2) of the directive. 7 November 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Family reunification | Countries: Netherlands |
|
Engaging with the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
6 November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Thematic Guidelines |
|
Myanmar gears up for first round of Rohingya repatriations amid doubts about their safety
6 November 2018 | Publisher: Radio Free Asia | Document type: Country News |
|
Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI): Report on issuance of the new Iraqi ID card
5 November 2018 | Publisher: Danish Immigration Service | Document type: Country Reports |
|
Ethiopia: Documents and citizenship
5 November 2018 | Publisher: Danish Immigration Service | Document type: Country Reports |
|
Rights groups warn conditions not conducive for return of Rohingya to Myanmar
2 November 2018 | Publisher: Radio Free Asia | Document type: Country News |
|
Reasons to Remain: Categorizing Protracted Displacement in Iraq
November 2018 | Publisher: International Organization for Migration (IOM) | Document type: Country Reports |
|
Immigration Detention Monitoring Self-study Modules: Programme Module 2
November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals |
|
Immigration Detention Monitoring Self-study Modules: Programme Module 4
November 2018 | Publisher: UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) | Document type: Training Manuals |
