Conclusion de l'Avocat general Wahl dans l'affaire C-635/17 E. contre Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Propose a la cour par le A.G. : L’article 11, paragraphe 2, de la directive 2003/86/CE du Conseil, du 22 septembre 2003, relative au droit au regroupement familial, doit être interprété en ce sens qu’il ne s’oppose pas à une législation nationale en vertu de laquelle le bénéficiaire d’une protection internationale est tenu, aux fins de l’examen de sa demande de regroupement familial, d’expliquer d’une manière plausible les raisons pour lesquelles il se trouve dans l’incapacité de fournir des pièces justificatives officielles attestant de l’existence d’un lien familial, pour autant que l’autorité nationale compétente apprécie ces explications au regard non seulement des informations pertinentes, tant générales que particulières, concernant la situation dans le pays d’origine de ce dernier, mais également de la situation particulière dans laquelle celui-ci se trouve. 29 November 2018 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Children's rights - Family reunification - Refugee identity documents - Right to family life | Countries: Eritrea - Netherlands |
Immigration Appeals Board v. A, B, and C, HR-2017-2078-A, (case no. 2017/670)
whether it is in accordance with the UN Refugee Convention article 28 to refuse to issue travel documents to refugees with lawful residence in Norway, because there is doubt regarding their identities 31 October 2017 | Judicial Body: Norway: Supreme Court | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): National security / Public order - Refugee identity documents - Travel documents | Countries: Eritrea - Iraq - Norway |
Immigration Appeals Board v. A, B, and C, HR-2017-2078-A, (case no. 2017/670)
whether it is in accordance with the UN Refugee Convention article 28 to refuse to issue travel documents to refugees with lawful residence in Norway, because there is doubt regarding their identities 31 October 2017 | Judicial Body: Norway: Supreme Court | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): National security / Public order - Refugee identity documents - Travel documents | Countries: Eritrea - Iraq - Norway |
Immigration Appeals Board v. A, B, and C, HR-2017-2078-A, (case no. 2017/670)
whether it is in accordance with the UN Refugee Convention article 28 to refuse to issue travel documents to refugees with lawful residence in Norway, because there is doubt regarding their identities 31 October 2017 | Judicial Body: Norway: Supreme Court | Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention | Topic(s): National security / Public order - Refugee identity documents - Travel documents | Countries: Eritrea - Iraq - Norway |
AA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
11 July 2017 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refugee identity documents - Travel documents | Countries: Iraq - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Babela v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
20 January 2003 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority | Countries: Congo, Republic of the - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |