Case Law
- Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal 1
- Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal 6
- Belgium: Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers 1
- Belgium: Cour constitutionnelle 1
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 42
- Czech Republic: Supreme Administrative Court 1
- France: Commission des Recours des Réfugiés (CRR) 1
- France: Conseil d'Etat 1
- Ireland: High Court 1
- New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority 1
- UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) 9
- United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority 1
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 1
- Access to procedures 1
- Appeal / Right to appeal 1
- Arbitrary arrest and detention 12
- Armed groups / Militias / Paramilitary forces / Resistance movements 8
- Armenian 1
- Asylum-seekers 1
- Christian 1
- Confidentiality 1
- Country of origin information (COI) 5
- Credibility assessment 2
- Criminal justice 11
- Death penalty 3
- Deportation / Forcible return 7
- Diplomatic assurances 1
- Disappeared persons 1
- Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity 1
- Domestic violence 1
- Effective remedy 13
- Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) 1
- Exhaustion of domestic remedies 1
- Expulsion 11
- Extradition 20
- Extrajudicial executions 1
- Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 35
- Freedom of assembly and association 1
- Freedom of expression 2
- Freedom of religion 1
- Freedom of speech 1
- Gender discrimination 1
- Gender-based persecution 1
- HIV and AIDS 4
- Habeas corpus 4
- Human rights activists 1
- Illegal immigrants / Undocumented migrants 1
- Immigration Detention 19
- Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) 1
- Jehovah's Witness 1
- Jew 1
- Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) 1
- Mandate status 1
- Muslim 5
- National security / Public order 1
- Non-refoulement 3
- Non-state agents of persecution 2
- Opposition 1
- Orthodox Christian 1
- Passports 2
- Persecution based on political opinion 11
- Persecution on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity 1
- Prison or detention conditions 6
- Prosecution vs persecution 4
- Prostitution / Commercial sex work 1
- Racial / Ethnic persecution 4
- Refoulement 1
- Refugee / Asylum law 2
- Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures 1
- Refugees 1
- Refugees sur place 1
- Rejected asylum-seekers 1
- Religious discrimination 2
- Religious persecution (including forced conversion) 10
- Residence permits / Residency 2
- Right to family life 3
- Right to liberty and security 15
- Right to life 2
- Rights of non-citizens 1
- Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness 2
- Russians 1
- Safe country of origin 1
- Scientologist 1
- Social group discrimination 2
- State protection 1
- Statelessness 4
- Suspensive effect 2
- Tatars 1
- Terrorism 4
- Torture 1
- Trafficking in persons 1
- Unlawful departure 2
- Uzbek 2
- Well-founded fear of persecution 1
- Withdrawal of nationality 1
|
CASE OF O.O. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 36321/16)
Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, Mr O.O. complained that the Russian authorities had failed to consider his arguments that he would face a real risk of ill-treatment if deported to Uzbekistan. He also alleged that his deportation had disregarded the interim measure indicated by the European Court, in breach of Article 34 (right of individual petition) of the European Convention. Violation of Article 3 – on account of the authorities deporting Mr O.O. to Uzbekistan Violation of Article 34 21 May 2019 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Russian Federation - Uzbekistan |
|
CASE OF B.U. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, (nos. 59609/17, 74677/17 and 76379/17)
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) 22 January 2019 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Russian Federation - Tajikistan - Uzbekistan |
|
CASE OF A.N. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 61689/16 and 3 others – see appended list)
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Tajikistan) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Uzbekistan) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-f - Extradition) 23 October 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: Russian Federation - Tajikistan - Uzbekistan |
|
CASE OF IBROGIMOV v. RUSSIA (Application no. 32248/12)
in the light of the overwhelming European and international consensus geared towards abolishing the outstanding restrictions on entry, stay and residence of HIV-positive non nationals who constitute a particularly vulnerable group, the respondent Government failed in their duty to put forward compelling reasons or any objective justification for their differential treatment for health reason 15 May 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion - HIV and AIDS | Countries: Russian Federation - Uzbekistan |
|
T.M. and Others v. Russia
7 November 2017 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Expulsion - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention - Non-refoulement - Right to liberty and security | Countries: Russian Federation - Uzbekistan |
|
Khaldarov v. Turkey
5 September 2017 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Asylum-seekers - Residence permits / Residency - Right to liberty and security | Countries: Turkey - Uzbekistan |
|
Kayum Ortikov v. Uzbekistan
27 January 2017 | Judicial Body: UN Human Rights Committee (HRC) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Legal representation / Legal aid | Countries: Uzbekistan |
|
Alimov v. Turkey
6 September 2016 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Effective remedy - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention - Prison or detention conditions | Countries: Turkey - Uzbekistan |
|
AATA Case No. 1502282
7 July 2016 | Judicial Body: Australia: Administrative Appeals Tribunal | Topic(s): Opposition - Persecution based on political opinion - Refugee / Asylum law - Social group discrimination | Countries: Australia - Uzbekistan |
|
Novruk and Others v. Russia
15 March 2016 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): HIV and AIDS - Right to family life | Countries: Kazakhstan - Moldova, Republic of - Russian Federation - Ukraine - Uzbekistan |
