Case Law

6 August 2009 | Judicial Body: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Equal opportunities - Equality before the law - Housing, land and property rights (HLP) - Residence permits / Residency - Right to a nationality - Right to liberty and security | Countries: Ecuador

Acción de tutela instaurada por Guillermina Castro Morales, Margarita Londoño Ruiz, y Claudia Yaned Villa Restrepo contra Acción Social.

14 November 2008 | Judicial Body: Colombia: Corte Constitucional | Topic(s): Equal opportunities - Extreme poverty - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) - Right to education - Right to food - Right to health | Countries: Colombia

Acción de tutela instaurada por Leydi Viviana Rivera Bastidas contra Universidad del Cauca.

6 November 2008 | Judicial Body: Colombia: Corte Constitucional | Topic(s): Equal opportunities - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) - Minority rights - Right to education | Countries: Colombia

17 October 2008 | Judicial Body: Colombia: Corte Constitucional | Topic(s): Equal opportunities - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) - Right to education | Countries: Colombia

Acción de tutela instaurada por Mayerly Cardozo Torres y otros en contra de la Alcaldía de Neiva (Huila).

22 July 2008 | Judicial Body: Colombia: Corte Constitucional | Topic(s): Civil and political rights - Equal opportunities - Housing, land and property rights (HLP) - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) | Countries: Colombia

Acciónes de tutela instauradas por Jeimy Paola Gil Gil y Pablo Emilio González López, contra la Agencia Presidencial para la Acción Social y la Cooperación Internacional.

21 July 2008 | Judicial Body: Colombia: Corte Constitucional | Topic(s): Economic, social and cultural rights - Equal opportunities - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) | Countries: Colombia

Six consolidated appeals: City and County of San Francisco v. State of California (A110449 [Super. Ct. S.F. City & County, No. CGC-04-429539]); Tyler v. State of California (A110450 [Super. Ct. L.A. County, No. BS-088506]); Woo v. Lockyer (A110451 [Super. Ct. S.F. City & County, No. CPF-04-504038]); Clinton v. State of California (A110463 [Super. Ct. S.F. City & County, No. CGC-04-429548]); Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund v. City and County of San Francisco (A110651 [Super. Ct. S.F. City & County, No. CPF-04-503943]); Campaign for California Families v. Newsom (A110652 [Super. Ct. S.F. City & County, No. CGC-04-428794]).

15 May 2008 | Judicial Body: United States: Supreme Court of California | Topic(s): Civil and political rights - Constitutional law - Equal opportunities - Family law - Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) - Right to family life | Countries: United States of America

This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision. For the Second Section judgment see: D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic dated 13 November 2007.

13 November 2007 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Children's rights - Country of origin information (COI) - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Equal opportunities - Minority rights - Right to education - Roma | Countries: Czech Republic

This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision. For the Second Section judgment see: D.H. et autres c. République Tchèque dated 13 November 2007.

13 November 2007 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Children's rights - Country of origin information (COI) - Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity - Equal opportunities - Right to education - Roma | Countries: Czech Republic