Sam Heller

@AbuJamajem

Senior Analyst, Non-State Armed Groups, . Looking at jihadism, one eye still on Syria. Jamajem means ☠️☠️☠️. Contact:

Beirut, Lebanon
Joined September 2011

Tweets

You blocked @AbuJamajem

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @AbuJamajem

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Jun 20

    Our latest at : On the now-endangered “de-escalation” covering Syria’s southwest, and what can be done to avert its bloody military end:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    2 hours ago

    Important. Jordan and Israel are increasingly likely to face thousands of Syrians who fear a Ghouta-like bloodbath, standing at their respective fences and asking for shelter. Some would be Syrians who recieved aid from both countries during the last few years.

    Undo
  3. 3 hours ago
    Undo
  4. 3 hours ago
    Undo
  5. 3 hours ago

    SANA: Syrian military advances in the Lajah.

    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    12 hours ago

    Will Washington help to spare civilian life in Syria's southwest, promoting the interests of Jordan and Israel, two close allies?

    Undo
  7. Retweeted

    ’s regime is turning southward. A regime offensive could: ➣ Destabilise ➣ Take a terrible civilian toll ➣ Trigger wider conflict between and Read report for what should be done ☟

    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    14 hours ago
    Undo
  9. Retweeted

    Escalation in military activity in and southern has led to thousand to be displaced, some 6000 people registered though the number of IDPs is likely to be higher

    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    16 hours ago

    [Thread] Earlier this week, said that 100 European companies are planning to discuss doing business in Iran. Here’s why this matters.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Jun 20

    The war in may be winding down but it's not over Our report describes risks posed by looming regime offensive in the southwest and how these can and should be mitigated by a deal involving the U.S., Russia and regional parties

    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    18 hours ago

    A Syrian military offensive on the southwest now seems imminent. But Washington might be able to do something about it.

    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    Jun 21

    Because south west Syria, where Assad already masses forces, has major regional implications, both for Jordan and for the Israel-Iran conflict, all sides may gain from addressing its future via negotiations rather than military force. Our new report shows why and how.

    Undo
  14. Retweeted

    In conversations with residents of southern Syria, many told me that if Israel does not intervene to stop the regime, they at least expect it to let refugees in. Thousands are reaching the areas abutting the fence on the Golan.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    18 hours ago

    . conflict alert: The fate of hangs in the balance as -backed forces launch a battle to expel rebels. World must act fast to avert catastrophe through a UN-mediated solution that safeguards all sides’ interests.

    Undo
  16. 19 hours ago

    9. There is no international constituency for unilaterally imposing a no-fly zone over the south and escalating opposite Russia, or for supplying rebels with the quantity and quality of weapons they would need to defend themselves. It doesn't exist, it's not real.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. 19 hours ago

    8. Because without a deal, Damascus likely also gets what it wants, through military means. It's an end that is sub-optimal for Damascus and its partners; worse for U.S. and its regional allies; and much, much worse for southerners, who will die and see their communities torn up.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. 19 hours ago

    7. The negotiated alternative we're pushing is based on existing, real channels and frameworks and is preferable – at least "better," if not necessarily "good" – for all sides. And it's something that, we think, could be worthwhile for Damascus and its allies, which matters.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. 19 hours ago

    6. But thanks in part to a turn in U.S. policy late last year, the de-escalation agreement failed to develop further into something that might have held Damascus's interest. After that, it was just a matter of time for Damascus to work down the list of remaining rebel-held areas.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. 19 hours ago

    5. The de-escalation, as conceived, had something for all sides – including Damascus, which wasn't at the negotiating table but whose interests were represented by its Russian ally.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. 19 hours ago

    4. This mode of thinking – that a ceasefire and an agreement can only be something "enforced" on Damascus, or by which Damascus is "punished" – is old, limited and unworkable.

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·