Court Interventions / Amicus Curiae
Interventions before courts by UNHCR and other organizations are an important tool through which protection standards can be developed and a consistent application of refugee law fostered. Interventions before courts may take different forms, depending on the national or supranational context, including formal amicus curiae briefs, advisory opinions or letters to the court or parties involved, as well as public statements. Interventions by UNHCR are carried out in the exercise of its supervisory function.
Refworld is the repository of all interventions made by UNHCR in judicial proceedings before national and regional courts. They are organised in reverse-chronological order and, where available, are linked to the court decision in the case(s) at hand once adopted.
Refworld is the repository of all interventions made by UNHCR in judicial proceedings before national and regional courts. They are organised in reverse-chronological order and, where available, are linked to the court decision in the case(s) at hand once adopted.
- Belgium 1
- Eritrea 1
- Georgia 1
- Greece 2
- Iraq 1
- Netherlands 1
- Romania 1
- Russian Federation 1
- Somalia 1
- Access to procedures 1
- Asylum-seekers 1
- Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity 1
- Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 1
- Human rights and fundamental freedoms 1
- Human rights courts 1
- Immigration Detention 2
- Legal representation / Legal aid 1
- Non-refoulement 1
- Persons with disabilities 1
- Political situation 1
- Prison or detention conditions 1
- Reception 2
- Refoulement 1
- Safe third country 1
- Security situation 1
- Single procedure 1
Selected filters: Council of Europe: Commissioner for Human Rights
Filter:
Showing 1-5 of 5 results
