Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights

The Court, based in Strasbourg, was set up as a result of the European Convention on Human Rights, created in 1950. This set out a catalogue of civil and political rights and freedoms. It allows people to lodge complaints against States which have signed up to the Convention for alleged violations of those rights. Although founded in 1950, the Court did not actually come into existence until 1959. It gained its present form as a single European Court of Human Rights when Protocol No. 11 to the ECHR took effect in 1998.

The Court is currently made up of 47 judges, one in principle for every State signed up to the Convention. They are elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and serve for six years. Judges sit on the Court as individuals and do not represent their country. Website: www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home

Narrow results by
Type
Topic
Type
- Type
- Topic

Case Law 9

Selected filters: Belarus

Filter:

Showing 1-9 of 9 results

K. v. Russia 23 May 2013 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Extradition - Habeas corpus - Immigration Detention \| Countries: Belarus - Russian Federation
Y.P. et L.P. c. France 2 September 2010 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Deportation / Forcible return - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Opposition - Rejected asylum-seekers \| Countries: Belarus - France
Puzan v. Ukraine The judgment became final on 18 May 2010. 18 February 2010 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Effective remedy - Extradition - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Immigration Detention - Pre-trial detention - Right to liberty and security \| Countries: Belarus - Ukraine
Svetlorusov v. Ukraine This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 12 March 2009 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Access to procedures - Arbitrary arrest and detention - Criminal justice - Extradition - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refugees - Right to justice \| Countries: Belarus - Ukraine
Novik v. Ukraine This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 18 December 2008 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Extradition - Immigration Detention - Right to liberty and security \| Countries: Belarus - Ukraine
Shchebet v. Russia This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 12 June 2008 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Access to procedures - Arbitrary arrest and detention - Prison or detention conditions - Right to liberty and security \| Countries: Belarus - Russian Federation
Matsiukhina and Matsiukhin v. Sweden 21 June 2005 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Countries: Belarus - Sweden
Svetlorusov c. Ukraine 31 May 2005 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Decision on admissibility \| Countries: Belarus - Ukraine
Gordyeyev v. Poland 3 May 2005 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Decision on admissibility \| Countries: Belarus - Poland

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips