United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
- Case Law 2
|
SHL (Tracing obligation/Trafficking) Afghanistan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
16 June 2013 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Document type: Case Law | Countries: Afghanistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
|
Shizad (sufficiency of reasons: set aside) [2013] UKUT 00085 (IAC)
(1) Although there is a legal duty to give a brief explanation of the conclusions on the central issue on which an appeal is determined, those reasons need not be extensive if the decision as a whole makes sense, having regard to the material accepted by the judge. (2) Although a decision may contain an error of law where the requirements to give adequate reasons are not met, the Upper Tribunal would not normally set aside a decision of the First-tier Tribunal where there has been no misdirection of law, the fact-finding process cannot be criticised and the relevant Country Guidance has been taken into account, unless the conclusions the judge draws from the primary data were not reasonably open to him or her. 11 February 2013 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Credibility assessment | Countries: Afghanistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
|
AA (unattended children) Afghanistan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
Heard at Field House on 28 October 2010 and 23 May 2011. 6 January 2012 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Children-at-risk - Unaccompanied / Separated children | Countries: Afghanistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
