Last Updated: Friday, 26 May 2023, 13:32 GMT

Nationality and statelessness / Statelessness

Selected filters: Case Law Austria
Filter:
Showing 1-7 of 7 results
Ra 2016/20/0038

The asylum authority must revoke protection status based on changed circumstances, if it had granted such status based on wrong assumptions even if the applicant had not caused or contributed to this error. (Underlying Case of Mohammed Bilali v BFA C- 720/17)

14 August 2019 | Judicial Body: Austria: Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) | Topic(s): Cancellation - Cessation clauses - Complementary forms of protection - Regional instruments - Statelessness | Countries: Algeria - Austria - Morocco

Mohammed Bilali v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl (Case C‑720/17) (request for preliminary ruling)

Article 19(1) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, read in conjunction with Article 16 thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State must revoke subsidiary protection status if it granted that status when the conditions for granting it were not met, in reliance on facts which have subsequently been revealed to be incorrect, and notwithstanding the fact that the person concerned cannot be accused of having misled the Member State on that occasion.

23 May 2019 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2011 Recast Qualification Directive (EU) | Topic(s): Cessation clauses - Complementary forms of protection - Statelessness | Countries: Austria

Conclusion de l'Avocat general Bot dans l'affaire C-720/17 Mohammed Bilali contre Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl [demande de décision préjudicielle formée par le Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Cour administrative, Autriche)]

Une autorité nationale compétente peut-elle se fonder sur les dispositions prévues à l’article 19 de la directive 2011/95/UE (2) afin de procéder à la révocation du statut conféré par la protection subsidiaire à un apatride, et ce en raison d’une appréciation erronée des besoins de protection internationale dont elle est seule responsable ?

24 January 2019 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Cessation clauses - Complementary forms of protection - Exclusion clauses - Statelessness | Countries: Algeria - Austria

W161 2121583-1

8 March 2016 | Judicial Body: Austria: Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) | Topic(s): Palestinian - Statelessness - Travel documents | Countries: Austria - Syrian Arab Republic

Applicant v. Austrian Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum

24 March 2014 | Judicial Body: Austria: Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht) | Topic(s): EU Qualification Directive - Palestinian - Statelessness | Countries: Austria - Palestine, State of - Syrian Arab Republic

Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern

2 March 2010 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Citizenship / Nationality law - Statelessness - Statelessness - Withdrawal of nationality | Countries: Austria - Germany

Okonkwo v. Austria

22 May 2001 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Criminal justice - Denial of nationality - Expulsion - Residence permits / Residency - Right to family life - Rights of non-citizens - Statelessness | Countries: Austria - Nigeria

Search Refworld