Adjudication of asylum claims (refugee status determination / asylum procedures) / Rejected asylum-seekers
- Case Law 3
|
AI and Others v Director of Asylum Seeker Management: Department of Home Affairs and Others (22059/18) [2019] ZAWCHC 114
The applicants have shown that they have a clear right to the relief they ultimately seek in the main application, a well-grounded apprehension of harm and no other satisfactory remedy. The respondents seek to have the Immigration Act trump the Refugees Act. This is contrary to the injunction in the Ruta case that the two statutes can and should be read in harmony. The applicants are thus entitled to the interim relief they seek, i.e. that they be issued with section 22 permits. 2 September 2019 | Judicial Body: South Africa: High Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Refugees sur place - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: Burundi - South Africa |
|
AI et al applicants
and
THE DIRECTOR OF ASYLUM SEEKER MANAGEMENT:
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS et al respondents
2 September 2019 | Judicial Body: South Africa: High Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Fresh / New claim - Refugees sur place - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: Burundi - South Africa |
|
Tafira and Others v. Ngozwane and Others
Judgement from the High Court of South Africa, Transvaal Provincial Division. 12 December 2006 | Judicial Body: South Africa: High Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Administrative law - Refugee / Asylum law - Rejected asylum-seekers | Countries: South Africa - Zimbabwe |
