Case Law
- Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal 1
- Austria: Higher Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) 1
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 12
- Czech Republic: Constitutional Court 1
- France: Commission des Recours des Réfugiés (CRR) 1
- Ireland: Supreme Court 1
- Moldova: Court of Centru Sector 1
- Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal 6
- United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority 3
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 1
- United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) 1
- United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) 1
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 1
- Children's rights 1
- Civil and political rights 1
- Complementary forms of protection 1
- Country of origin information (COI) 3
- Credibility assessment 1
- Domestic violence 1
- Effective protection 2
- Effective remedy 1
- Election law 1
- Elections 2
- Exhaustion of domestic remedies 1
- Expulsion 2
- Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 7
- Freedom of assembly and association 1
- Freedom of religion 1
- Gagauz 1
- Gender discrimination 2
- Grounds for persecution 1
- HIV and AIDS 1
- Human rights activists 1
- Human rights and fundamental freedoms 1
- Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) 2
- Jehovah's Witness 1
- Jew 1
- Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) 1
- Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription 1
- Non-refoulement 1
- Non-state agents of persecution 3
- Opposition 2
- Passports 1
- Persecution based on political opinion 1
- Persecution on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity 1
- Political parties 2
- Pre-trial detention 2
- Prison or detention conditions 3
- Prosecution vs persecution 1
- Public health 1
- Racial / Ethnic persecution 1
- Refoulement 1
- Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures 1
- Religious persecution (including forced conversion) 1
- Right to family life 3
- Right to liberty and security 1
- Romanians 2
- SGBV 1
- Safe third country 2
- Single procedure 1
- Social group persecution 3
- Standard of proof 1
- State protection 3
- Statelessness 1
- Trafficking in persons 2
- Women-at-risk 1
|
XXX v. Ostrava Regional Court (decision of 4 December 2000), High Court in Olomouc (decision of 28 February 2001) and Minister of Justice of the Czech Republic (decision of 15 October 2002) (Constitutional Court Case No. 752/02)
The decision of the Ostrava Regional Court of 4 December 2000, the decision High Court in Olomouc of 28 February 2001 and the decision of the Minister of Justice of the Czech Republic of 15 October 2002 are being cancelled because of contradiction with Article 3 of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civic and Political Rights and Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms. Decisions of the Constitutional Court can not be appealed. 15 April 2003 | Judicial Body: Czech Republic: Constitutional Court | Topic(s): Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement | Countries: Czech Republic - Moldova, Republic of |
|
OV (Persecution - PSG - Jews) Moldova v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
27 February 2003 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Freedom of religion - Jew - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - State protection | Countries: Moldova, Republic of - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
|
Revenko v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
31 July 2000 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Statelessness | Countries: Moldova, Republic of - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
|
Zareg Case; Decision Regarding the Appeal
Note: all decisions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. Names of defendants have been changed in order to safeguard their right to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 6 June 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of - Sudan |
|
Zareg: Appeal of the Sentence
Note: all decisions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. Names of defendants have been changed in order to safeguard their right to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 24 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of - Sudan |
|
Medah Case: Decision Regarding the Administrative Penalty
Notes: All decisions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. Names of defendants were changed in order to safeguard their rights to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 18 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of |
|
Zareg Case: Sentence in Criminal Case
Note: All decions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. The names of defendants were changed in order to safeguard their rights to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 14 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Court of Centru Sector | Countries: Moldova, Republic of |
|
Moudih Case: Decision Regarding the Administrative Penalty
Note: All decisions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. Names of defendants were changed in order to safeguard their rights to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 14 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of |
|
Simsaed Case: Decision Regarding the Administrative Penalty
Note: All decions were taken in absence of national law on refugee status. The names of defendants were changed in order to safeguard their rights to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 14 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of |
|
Malima Case: Decision Regarding the Administrative Penalty
Note: All decisions were taken in absence of natioanl law on refugee status. Names of defendants were changed in order to safeguard their rights to privacy. This is an unofficial translation. 14 April 2000 | Judicial Body: Moldova: Judicial Board for Criminal Cases of Chisinau Tribunal | Countries: Moldova, Republic of |
