Title	Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land
Publisher	International Conferences (The Hague)
Publication Date	18 October 1907
Topics	International humanitarian law (IHL) / Geneva Conventions | Protection of civilian persons in time of war | Treaties / Agreements / Charters / Protocols / Conventions / Declarations
Reference	Entry into force: 26 January 1910
Cite as	International Conferences (The Hague), Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land, 18 October 1907, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddca4e14.html [accessed 17 January 2017]
Comments	The law of neutrality was mainly developed during the 19th century. The most important factors in its development were the two Armed Neutralities of 1780 and 1800, the attitude of the United States towards neutrality, the permanent neutrality of Switzerland and Belgium and the Declaration of Paris of 1856. At the Second Hague Peace Conference the subject seemed to be ready for codification. In spite of being to a large extent declaratory of existing international law, the two Conventions on neutrality concluded at The Hague were not ratified by Great Britain, Italy and some other States. Apart from the two conventions other Conventions concluded in 1907 are also important for the law of neutrality, particularly the Convention (VII) relating to the Conversion of Merchant Ships into War-Ships, the Convention (XI) relative to Certain Restrictions with regard to the Exercise of the Right of Capture in Naval War and the Convention (XII) relative to the Creation of an International Prize Court. Furthermore, the unratified Declaration of London of 1909 contained the most important rules concerning neutrality in naval war. As a consequence of the two World Wars, the prohibition of the resort to war and the systems of collective security established by the League of Nations and the United Nations, the traditional law of neutrality has lost much of its former importance.
Disclaimer	This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.