Last Updated: Monday, 30 October 2017, 12:42 GMT

Tanzania: The practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) or female genital cutting (FGC) among the Hehe or the Kihehe ethnic group; its prevalence in Dar es Salaam; age at which the girl or woman undergoes the procedure

Publisher Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Author Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Canada
Publication Date 17 December 2003
Citation / Document Symbol TZA42301.E
Reference 1
Cite as Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Tanzania: The practice of female genital mutilation (FGM) or female genital cutting (FGC) among the Hehe or the Kihehe ethnic group; its prevalence in Dar es Salaam; age at which the girl or woman undergoes the procedure, 17 December 2003, TZA42301.E, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/403dd21f10.html [accessed 2 November 2017]
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

The Research Directorate found just one documentary source specifically referencing the Hehe in regards to the practice of female genital mutilation (FGM). According to The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females (1993), the Hehe is one of 13 ethnic groups within Tanzania who practice FGM. The other 12 ethnic groups listed are the Masai, Basembeti-Suba, Bakuria, Komaki, Chaga, Pare, Shambala, Gogo, Rangi, Turu, Bena and the Nilo-Hamitic (Hosken 1993, Appendix).

Sources specifically mentioning the Kihehe or the prevalence of FGM in Dar es Salaam could not be found among the sources consulted.

For general information on the practice of FGM in Tanzania including the availability of state protection, please consult TZA41742.E of 11 July 2003.

This Response was prepared after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the Research Directorate within time constraints. This Response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Please find below the list of additional sources consulted in researching this Information Request.

Reference

Hosken, Fran. P. 1993. 4th rev. ed. The Hosken Report: Genital and Sexual Mutilation of Females. Lexington, Mass.: Women's International Network News.

Additional Sources Consulted

Dialog

IRB Databases

Women's International Network News

Internet sites, including:

Africa Action

Amnesty International (AI)

BBC Africa

Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR)

Center for Reproductive Law and Policy (CRLP) and the Child and Law Foundation

Communicating for Change (CFC)

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2002

Female Genital Cutting Education and Networking Project

Human Rights Watch (HRW)

Inter-African Committee (IAC) on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women

Inter-Church Coalition on Africa

Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN)

International Planned Parenthood Federation

Measure DHS+

Research Action and Information Network for the Bodily Integrity of Women (RAINBO)

United Nations Fund for Women and Development (UNIFEM)

World Health Organization, Africa Regional Office

Search engine:

Google

Copyright notice: This document is published with the permission of the copyright holder and producer Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB). The original version of this document may be found on the offical website of the IRB at http://www.irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/. Documents earlier than 2003 may be found only on Refworld.

Search Refworld