Last Updated: Monday, 16 October 2017, 14:54 GMT

English
| Español
| Русский

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Case Law 9

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Selected filters: Legal Information Refoulement

Filter:

Showing 1-9 of 9 results

BM and Others (returnees – criminal and non-criminal) (CG) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 2 June 2015 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refoulement - Rejected asylum-seekers \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
X v. the State Secretary for Security and Justice 27 June 2014 \| Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: Council of State (Raad van State) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Exclusion clauses - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Refoulement - Witnesses \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Netherlands
Final Appeal Nos 18, 19 & 20 of 2011 (Civil) between C, KMF, BF (Applicants) and Director of Immigration, Secretary for Security (Respondents) and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Intervener) 25 March 2013 \| Judicial Body: Hong Kong: Court of Final Appeal \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Non-refoulement - Refoulement - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - UNHCR mandate \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region of China)
Eveline Njamba and Kathy Balikosa v. Sweden 3 June 2010 \| Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - HIV and AIDS - Non-refoulement - Refoulement \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Sweden
Mubilanzila Mayeka et Kaniki Mitunga c. Belgique DÉFINITIF 12/01/2007. Cet arrêt deviendra définitif dans les conditions définies à l'article 44 § 2 de la Convention. Il peut subir des retouches de forme. 12 October 2006 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Airports - Family reunification - Immigration Detention - Non-refoulement - Refoulement - Rejection at border - Travel documents \| Countries: Belgium - Congo, Democratic Republic of the
Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 12 October 2006 \| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Airports - Family reunification - Immigration Detention - Non-refoulement - Refoulement - Rejection at border - Travel documents \| Countries: Belgium - Congo, Democratic Republic of the
N.M. v. Switzerland Display in UN document template ENGLISH Original: FRENCH 4 September 2000 \| Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Switzerland
K.T. v. Switzerland Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH 18 April 2000 \| Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Switzerland
X, Y, and Z v. Sweden Display in UN document template Original: ENGLISH 6 May 1998 \| Judicial Body: UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refoulement \| Countries: Congo, Democratic Republic of the - Sweden

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips