UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
CASE OF LIU v. POLAND (Application no. 37610/18)
1. The applicant complained that his extradition to China would violate Article 3 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention as – if extradited and tried – he would be at risk of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment; moreover, he would be denied a fair trial. He also complained under Article 5 § 1 that his detention pending extradition was unreasonably long and, therefore, arbitrary. 6 October 2022 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Diplomatic assurances - Extradition - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment | Countries: China - Poland |
Lai Cheong Sing and Tsang Ming Na v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Application for judicial review. 5 April 2007 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Diplomatic assurances - Exclusion clauses - Prosecution vs persecution - Right to justice - Serious non-political crime | Countries: Canada - China |
Lai Cheong Sing and Tsang Ming Na c. Canada (Ministre de la citoyenneté et de l'immigration)
Application for judicial review. 5 April 2007 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Diplomatic assurances - Exclusion clauses - Prosecution vs persecution - Right to justice - Serious non-political crime | Countries: Canada - China |