Last Updated: Friday, 01 November 2019, 13:47 GMT

Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal

The Refugee Review Tribunal was a statutory body which provided a final, independent, merits review of decisions made by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship or, in practice, by officers of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), acting as delegates of the Minister, to refuse to grant protection visas to non-citizens within Australia, or to cancel protection visas held by non-citizens in Australia. The Tribunal was established in 1993 under Part 7 of the Act and replaced the Refugee Status Review Committee (RSRC). On 1 July 2015 the Refugee Review Tribunal was amalgamated into the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.  Website: www.aat.gov.au/
Selected filters: Public health
Filter:
Showing 21-26 of 26 results
RRT Case No. 071509463

19 September 2007 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Persecution based on political opinion - Public health - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Right to employment - Right to health - Shia | Countries: Australia - Lebanon

RRT Case No. 071558011

22 August 2007 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Public health - Right to health - Social group persecution

RRT Case No. 071295385

20 June 2007 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Older persons - Public health - Social group persecution - Widowed persons - Women-at-risk | Countries: Australia - Sri Lanka

China: a) Was a preventative vaccine for bird flu being distributed during 2005? if so, what agency was the source? b) Are there reports of an outbreak of bird flu in Fujian in August 2005? c) If no reports are found, is there any evidence indicating that such situations might remain unpublicised by the Chinese media or internationally? How transparent were the PRC authorities being in 05/06 re their attempts to combat bird flu? d) Are there reports of corrupt officials in China issuing faulty bird flu vaccines? e) If farmers in Fujian wanted compensation for losses from a faulty bird flu vaccine, is there any evidence that corrupt local officials would get away with scuppering an investigation and imprisoning their accusers?

13 February 2007 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

China: 1. What is the current security situation in the Solomon Islands with respect to foreigners and people of Chinese ethnicity in particular? 2. Is there a real risk of Chinese people suffering harm in the Solomon Islands? 3. What is the current population of Chinese persons in the Solomon Islands and what are they generally engaged in doing in the country? 4. What is the general attitude of the authorities including the courts, towards foreigners and their security? 5. Do disabled people suffer harm in China? 6. Are there government and NGO facilities for the disabled in China? 7. Are there government sponsored health programs to assist the needy? 8. Are there special facilities for the disabled? 9. Can you provide any information on access to basic medical and social services? 10. Are disabled children denied access to education? 11. Are there any programs deigned for the disabled in China? 12. Do the Chinese authorities allow Christians to practice their religion in the privacy of their homes? 13. To what countries could the standard of care in hospitals in China be compared to? 14. Question deleted

4 October 2006 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Turkey: 1. Is there any discrimination against persons with disabilities in employment, education, access to health care, access to justice (accessibility included) or in the provision of other state services in Turkey?

20 January 2006 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld