Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal

The Refugee Review Tribunal was a statutory body which provided a final, independent, merits review of decisions made by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship or, in practice, by officers of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), acting as delegates of the Minister, to refuse to grant protection visas to non-citizens within Australia, or to cancel protection visas held by non-citizens in Australia. The Tribunal was established in 1993 under Part 7 of the Act and replaced the Refugee Status Review Committee (RSRC). On 1 July 2015 the Refugee Review Tribunal was amalgamated into the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Website: www.aat.gov.au/

Narrow results by
Type
Type
- Type

Query Responses 7

Selected filters: China Freedom of speech

Filter:

Showing 1-7 of 7 results

China: 1. Is there any information about treatment of family members of persons who have complained/petitioned against corruption by local government officials in China (and in particular Fujian Province)? 25 January 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Can you provide translations of information about the criminal offence of assaulting a police officer and provision for minors? 2. Is there any information suggesting that members of the Local Church do not celebrate Christmas or Easter? 3. Do members of the Local Church believe in and study the Old Testament? 4. Are there any reports of overseas activists' computers being hacked and wiped by Chinese authorities? 5. Are there any reports or information which suggests that the government undertook a campaign of checking computers of people with police records due to the threat of the China Jasmine Revolution? 6. Is there any information about what information was publicly available in China in relation to the Jasmine Revolution (events in China) and when this ceased to be available? 18 January 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Are there any reports confirming that medical testing has been carried out at the No. 93 Hospital of the People's Liberation Army? 2. Is it probable that the authorities would pursue someone who revealed/spoke of information such as this? 3. Ten times is a considerable amount to have been questioned by the police. Is this usual in these type of situations? 4. Is it possible to have a valid passport issued after this amount of police interest? 22 September 2006 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. How do the Chinese authorities view the Epoch Times? 2. Was the publication of the Nine Commentaries of concern to the Chinese authorities? 3. [Deleted] 4. Is there a "black list" kept by the Chinese authorities of citizens who criticise the government abroad? 4 August 2006 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. On organising free trade unions. 2. On Falungong. 3. Publications from Taiwan 31 May 2006 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Can you find any information about the newspaper "Epoch Times International"? 23 May 2006 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Update any adverse interest that the PRC authorities currently have in Dr Jiang, particularly after mid 2004. 2. Any evidence of voicing of popular opinion in support of Dr Jiang and how people who voice support for Dr Jiang's calls for revision of 4.6.89 are being treated by authorities 15 May 2006 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips