Persons of concern / Asylum-seekers
|
Switzerland: Judgement FAC E-1813_2019 of 1 July 2020[1539]
This decision was about the granting of family asylum to a woman of Tibetan ethnicity. It represent a landmark judgment of the FAC acknowledging the existence of a new specific circumstance that goes against the granting of family asylum. The FAC overrules the decision of the SEM to refuse family asylum and refers the matter back to the SEM for further investigation and reassessment. 1 July 2020 | Judicial Body: Switzerland: Tribunal administratif fédéral | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Family reunification - Refugee / Asylum law - Tibetan | Countries: China - Switzerland |
|
Matter of J-G-
Rescission of an in absentia order is not required to reopen proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal. The numerical limitations on filing motions to reopen are not applicable to an alien seeking reopening to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based on changed country conditions. Record remanded for further proceedings. 18 July 2013 | Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals | Countries: China - United States of America |
|
Matter of T-M-H- & S-W-C-
29 January 2010 | Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Fresh / New claim - One-child policy / Family planning | Countries: China - United States of America |
|
R (on the application of HBH) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
Application for judicial review. 6 May 2009 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Criminal justice - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Immigration Detention | Countries: China - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
