Last Updated: Friday, 26 May 2023, 13:32 GMT

Persons of concern / Asylum-seekers

Selected filters: Case Law
Filter:
Showing 41-50 of 181 results
YS v. Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, and Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel v. M, S

17 July 2014 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Confidentiality - Residence permits / Residency | Countries: Netherlands

Mouayad Rafik Abbas v. State Migration Service

8 July 2014 | Judicial Body: Armenia: Administrative Court of Appeals | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Deportation / Forcible return - National security / Public order - Non-refoulement - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - UNHCR mandate | Countries: Armenia - Syrian Arab Republic

Mohammadi v. Austria

3 July 2014 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Asylum-seekers - Deportation / Forcible return - Expulsion - Non-refoulement - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Regional instruments - Safe third country | Countries: Afghanistan - Austria - Hungary - Serbia

RRT Case No. 1304427

11 October 2013 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Topic(s): Asylum-seekers - Persecution based on political opinion - Tamil | Countries: Australia - Sri Lanka

Adam and others v. The Knesset and others (7146/12); Doe and others v. Ministry of Interior and others (1192/13); Tahangas and others v. Ministry of Interior (1247/13)

For related decisions see Tashuma Noga Desta et al. v. The Knesset et al. & Eitan – Israeli Immigration Policy Center et al. v. The Israeli Government et al. These decisions deal with Amendments 3, 4 and 5 to the Law for the Prevention of Infiltration taken by the Supreme Court in its capacity as the High Court of Justice.

16 September 2013 | Judicial Body: Israel: Supreme Court | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Asylum-seekers - Border controls - Effective remedy - Freedom of movement - Non-refoulement - Refugees - Rejection at border - Right to seek asylum - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Israel

Adam and others v. The Knesset and others (7146/12); Doe and others v. Ministry of Interior and others (1192/13); Tahangas and others v. Ministry of Interior (1247/13)

For related decisions see Tashuma Noga Desta et al. v. The Knesset et al. & Eitan – Israeli Immigration Policy Center et al. v. The Israeli Government et al. These decisions deal with Amendments 3, 4 and 5 to the Law for the Prevention of Infiltration taken by the Supreme Court in its capacity as the High Court of Justice.

16 September 2013 | Judicial Body: Israel: Supreme Court | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Asylum-seekers - Border controls - Effective remedy - Freedom of movement - Non-refoulement - Refugees - Rejection at border - Right to seek asylum - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: Israel

Matter of J-G-

Rescission of an in absentia order is not required to reopen proceedings to apply for asylum and withholding of removal. The numerical limitations on filing motions to reopen are not applicable to an alien seeking reopening to apply for asylum and withholding of removal based on changed country conditions. Record remanded for further proceedings.

18 July 2013 | Judicial Body: United States Board of Immigration Appeals | Countries: China - United States of America

Decision KKO:2013:21

5 April 2013 | Judicial Body: Finland: Supreme Court | Topic(s): 1951 Refugee Convention - Asylum-seekers - Criminal justice - Entry / Exit - False documents - Passports - Smuggling of persons - Travel documents | Countries: Afghanistan - Finland

Scalabrini Centre, Cape Town and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others

The Minister of Home Affairs and others v Scalabrino Centre Cape Town

19 March 2013 | Judicial Body: South Africa: High Court | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Appeal / Right to appeal - Asylum-seekers - Internally displaced persons (IDPs) - Migrants - Reception - Registration | Countries: South Africa

Defence for Children International (DCI ) v. Belgium - decision on the merits

23 October 2012 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights | Countries: Belgium

Search Refworld