UNHRC 31: Murder of Berta Cáceres must be investigated and states must do more to protect defenders
| Publisher | Article 19 |
| Publication Date | 4 March 2016 |
| Cite as | Article 19, UNHRC 31: Murder of Berta Cáceres must be investigated and states must do more to protect defenders, 4 March 2016, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/56df3bc3978.html [accessed 1 November 2019] |
| Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |
Following the brutal murder of Honduran environmental activist, Berta Cáceres, ARTICE 19 joined International Service for Human Rights' oral statement in response to the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders at the 31st session of the UN Human Rights Council.
The statement pays tribute to Berta and fellow activists around the world who risk their lives to defend the rights of themselves and their communities, and asks how states could do more to protect defenders at risk
Mr Forst, we welcome your reports.
We join you and some States in expressing our sadness and outrage following the murder yesterday morning of Berta Caceres in Honduras. We call on Honduras to guarantee the thorough, impartial investigation of this crime, recognising that impunity fuels further risks for defenders in the country, and commence inclusive consultations on the effective implementation of its recently adopted defenders law.
Bertha defended ESC and other rights of indigenous and campesino communities, and denounced human rights abuses in the context of large-scale development projects including mining and hydroelectric projects. Her killing is emblematic of the grave risks faced by defenders addressing economic, social and cultural rights, and underlines the need for a strong, substantive resolution on this theme by the Council.
With regard to your comprehensive observations report, covering almost 80 States from all regions of the world, we note that about one third of the communications dealt with follow-up to previous cases, and urge you to make available a regularly updated list of 'outstanding' cases, so as to facilitate follow up to previously covered incidents.
Your report mentions the important work of the African Commission to highlight violations against defenders on the basis of their gender and/or their work in areas such as sexuality, reproductive health and women's rights. We encourage you to continue cooperation with this and other regional mechanisms, and to ensure coordinated implementation.
Turning to your annual report, we welome the clear articulation of 7 principles that should underpin policies and practices to protect and support defenders. Overall, they provide useful benchmarks for both your mandate, and the Human Rights Council, to measure the extent to which States fulfil their obligation to protect defenders.
Key among these is that, in consultation with civil society, States should develop and implement specific national laws and mechanisms to protect defenders and to investigate and ensure accountability for threats and attacks against them.
We reiterate your recommendation to NHRIs to develop action plans and establish focal points for the protection of defenders, and welcome the call for business to contribute to the protection of defenders by supporting them and condemn attacks on their work, and for donors to provide long-term, flexible financial support to defenders. We also echo your call on the UN itself to strengthen the protection of defenders, including through the 'Rights Up Front' initiative and the Sustainable Development Goals, and an enhanced institutional response to reprisals.
In concluding, Mr Forst, could you elaborate further on how States nationally and the Council in its resolutions could apply the 7 principles in contexts where defenders are at risk?
