| Title | In the Petition of Sukhwat Singh Gill for Judicial Review of a decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to certify his claim as "clearly unfounded" in terms of section 94(2) of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 |
| Publisher | United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) |
| Author | Court of Session (Outer House) |
| Publication Date | 18 May 2006 |
| Country | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | India |
| Topics | Agents of persecution | Country of origin information (COI) | Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) | Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) | Manifestly unfounded / Clearly abusive claims | State protection | Well-founded fear of persecution |
| Citation / Document Symbol | [2006] CSOH 78 |
| Cite as | In the Petition of Sukhwat Singh Gill for Judicial Review of a decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to certify his claim as "clearly unfounded" in terms of section 94(2) of the Nationality Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, [2006] CSOH 78, United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland), 18 May 2006, available at: http://www.refworld.org/cases,GBR_CS,470245912.html [accessed 14 September 2017] |
| Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |