Petition for review granted on grounds that both the Immigration Judge and the BIA applied the wrong legal standard ("The immigration judge made a clear legal error by concluding that the 'facts do not compel a finding that [the applicant] suffered past persecution'”.), and case remanded for further proceedings.
Submitted: 6 April, 1994; Filed: 18 April, 1994
The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 34-4 and Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)
Submitted: 6 December, 1993; Filed: 21 December, 1993
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Accordingly, we deny Mahroozadeh's request for oral argument