|
CASE OF M.S. v. SLOVAKIA AND UKRAINE
(Application no. 17189/11)
The applicant complained that the Slovakian authorities, having
arrested him after he had crossed from Ukraine, had failed to inform him of
the reasons for his arrest, in violation of Article 5 § 2 of the Convention.
They had then returned him to Ukraine, where he had been detained in
inadequate conditions in disregard of his alleged status as a minor, in breach
of Article 3. He had been unable to participate effectively in the proceedings
concerning his detention, and had eventually been returned to Afghanistan
in the absence of an adequate assessment of the risks he had faced there, in
breach of Article 3, Article 5 §§ 1, 2 and 4, and Article 13 of the
Convention. Lastly, he alleged, under Article 34, that an NGO
representative had been denied access to him in Ukraine, preventing him
from lodging an application for an interim measure with the Court.
11 June 2020
| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights
| Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
| Topic(s):
Children's rights
- Expulsion
- Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment
- Immigration Detention
- Legal representation / Legal aid
- Rejected asylum-seekers
| Countries:
Afghanistan
- Slovakia
- Ukraine
|
|
AFFAIRE BILALOVA ET AUTRES c. POLOGNE
(Requête no 23685/14)
Relying in particular on Article 5 § 1 (f) (right to liberty and security), the applicants complained
about their placement and retention in the closed centre for aliens, alleging, inter alia, that they
were illegal.
Violation of Article 5 § 1 f) – in respect of the applicant children, concerning their retention in the closed centre
26 March 2020
| Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights
| Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
| Topic(s):
Children's rights
- Expulsion
- Rejected asylum-seekers
- Right to liberty and security
| Countries:
Germany
- Poland
- Russian Federation
|
