Application for judicial review.
12 August 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Catholic - Christian - Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Australia - China
22 July 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Falun Gong - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Witnesses | Countries: Australia - China
17 July 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Derivative status - Falun Gong - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Persecution of family members - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Sur place persecution | Countries: Australia - China
4 July 2008 | Judicial Body: New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Credibility assessment - Falun Gong - Persecution based on political opinion - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: China - New Zealand
The judgment was subsequently appealed before the High Court of Australia [2009] HCA 40.
19 June 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Topic(s): Christian - Credibility assessment - Falun Gong - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Seventh Day Adventist - Sur place persecution | Countries: Australia - China
30 May 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Topic(s): Corruption - Credibility assessment - Criminal justice - Persecution based on political opinion - Police | Countries: Australia - China
27 May 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Credibility assessment - Persecution based on political opinion - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - China
Heard at Field House on 21-23 January 2008. The decisions in WC (No Risk of Double Punishment) China v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKIAT 00253 and SC (Double Jeopardy - WC Considered) China v. Secretary of State for the Home Department CG [2006] UKAIT 00007 are no longer factually accurate, and SC should no longer be treated as country guidance. The Court of Appeal (England and Wales) dismissed a subsequent appeal: [2009] EWCA Civ 81. Guidance subsequently confirmed by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) in YF (double jeopardy - JC confirmed) China CG [2011] UKUT 32 (IAC).
14 May 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority | Topic(s): Burden of proof - Corruption - Country of origin information (COI) - Credibility assessment - Criminal justice - Deportation / Forcible return - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Persecution based on political opinion - Prison or detention conditions - Prosecution vs persecution | Countries: China - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
13 May 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Falun Gong - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Visas | Countries: Australia - China
11 April 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Falun Gong - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Australia - China
