Case Law
- Access to procedures 3
- Airports 2
- Arbitrary arrest and detention 2
- Asylum-seekers 3
- Chechen 2
- Children's rights 2
- Criminal justice 3
- Decision on admissibility 2
- Denial of refugee status 1
- Deportation / Forcible return 6
- Discrimination based on race, nationality, ethnicity 2
- Effective remedy 7
- Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) 1
- Expulsion 5
- Extradition 2
- Family law 1
- Family reunification 4
- Female genital mutilation (FGM) 1
- Forced marriage 1
- Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 11
- Freedom of expression 2
- Gender-based persecution 1
- HIV and AIDS 2
- Human rights law 1
- Illegal immigrants / Undocumented migrants 1
- Immigration Detention 8
- Jurisdiction 1
- Minorities 1
- National security / Public order 1
- Non-refoulement 4
- Opposition 1
- Passports 1
- Persecution based on political opinion 1
- Pre-trial detention 1
- Prison or detention conditions 1
- Proof of nationality 1
- Reception 2
- Refoulement 4
- Refugee / Asylum law 1
- Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures 2
- Regional instruments 1
- Rejection at border 2
- Religious discrimination 1
- Religious persecution (including forced conversion) 1
- Residence permits / Residency 1
- Right to family life 5
- Right to health 4
- Right to justice 1
- Right to liberty and security 3
- Roma 1
- Safe country of origin 1
- Safe third country 3
- Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) 1
- Sikh 1
- Single procedure 3
- Suspensive effect 3
- Terrorism 1
- Travel documents 2
- Treaties / Agreements / Charters / Protocols / Conventions / Declarations 1
- Unaccompanied / Separated children 1
- Visas 2
- Women-at-risk 1
|
Ntumba Kabongo c. Belgique
2 June 2005 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Decision on admissibility | Countries: Belgium - Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
|
Conka v. Belgium
This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. 5 February 2002 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return | Countries: Belgium - Slovakia |
|
De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium
24 February 1997 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Freedom of expression - Right to justice | Countries: Belgium |
|
C. v. Belgium
The case is numbered 35/1995/541/627. The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number). The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission. 26 May 1996 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Countries: Belgium - Morocco |
|
Moustaquim v. Belgium
18 February 1991 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Countries: Belgium - Morocco |
|
Moustaquim c. Belgique
18 February 1991 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Countries: Belgium - Morocco |
|
Albert and Le Compte v. Belgium
28 January 1983 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Countries: Belgium |
|
Marckx v. Belgium
13 June 1979 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Right to family life | Countries: Belgium |
