Sudan
- Case Law 4
UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.
- African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies
- African Union/United Nations Mission in Darfur (UNAMID)
- Amnesty International - Sudan
- Darfur Consortium
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - Sudan
- Human Rights Watch (HRW) - Sudan
- Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) - Sudan
- Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) - Sudan
- International Committee of the Red Cross - The ICRC in Sudan
- International Crisis Group (ICG) - Sudan
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) - Sudan
- Miraya FM
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) - Sudan
- ReliefWeb - Sudan (the)
- Rift Valley Institute
- Sudan News Agency (SUNA)
- Sudan Tribune
- UNHCR - Sudan
- United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) - Sudan
- United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS)
- United Nations News Centre - News Focus: Sudan
- United States Department of State - Sudan
- United States Department of State: Congressional Research Service Reports (CRS) and Issue Briefs
- World Food Programme (WFP) - Sudan
- World Health Organization (WHO) - Sudan
|
AFFAIRE M.A. c. BELGIQUE (Requête no 19656/18)
The case concerned the applicant’s removal to Sudan by the Belgian authorities in spite of a court decision ordering the suspension of the measure. The Court found in particular that on account of procedural defects attributable to the Belgian authorities prior to the applicant’s removal to Sudan, he had been prevented from pursuing the asylum application that he had lodged in Belgium and the Belgian authorities had not sufficiently assessed the real risks that he faced in Sudan. In addition, by deporting the applicant in spite of the court order to suspend the measure, the authorities had rendered ineffective the applicant’s successful appeal. 27 October 2020 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Effective remedy - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Suspensive effect | Countries: Belgium - Sudan |
|
OPINION OF LORD TYRE In the petition O M (Petitioner) against SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (Respondent) [2018] CSOH 17
The observation by the court in MIAB at paragraph 68 that many of the time-limits in the Dublin III Regulation are solely intended to regulate the position as between different member states is, at least as regards the six month time limit in article 29(1), inconsistent with the Court’s ruling that an applicant is entitled to rely upon expiry of the time limit in order to resist a transfer to the requested state. The same goes for the obiter observation of the Lord Ordinary in BM at paragraph 26 that the time limits in article 29(1) are solely intended to regulate the matter between member states. nothing in Shiri that casts any doubt on the correctness of the views expressed in both MIAB and BM regarding the suspensive effect of an administrative cancellation of removal directions falling within article 27(4). 12 March 2018 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Session (Scotland) | Document type: Case Law | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Suspensive effect | Countries: Sudan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
|
A.A. c. France
15 January 2015 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Appeal / Right to appeal - Armed forces / Military - Armed groups / Militias / Paramilitary forces / Resistance movements - Evidence (including age and language assessments / medico-legal reports) - Suspensive effect - Torture | Countries: France - Sudan |
|
I.M. c. France
Intervention orale du HCR devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme Audience dans l'affaire I.M. c. France, 17 mai 2011 ; Observations actualisées du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme dans l'affaire I. M. c. France, requête no. 9152/09, 31 mars 2011; Observations écrites du Haut Commissariat des Nations Unies pour les réfugiés devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme dans l'affaire I. M. c/ France, requête no. 9152/09, septembre 2009. 2 February 2012 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Effective remedy - Expedited procedures - Immigration Detention - Non-refoulement - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - Suspensive effect | Countries: France - Sudan |
