Case Law
- Australia: High Court 1
- Austria: Supreme Court 1
- Belgium: Conseil du Contentieux des Etrangers 4
- Council of Europe: European Committee of Social Rights 2
- Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights 6
- European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union 8
- France: Conseil d'Etat 1
- Germany: Bundesverfassungsgericht 1
- Germany: Verwaltungsgericht 1
- Ireland: High Court 1
- Netherlands, The: The Hague District Court 1
- South Africa: High Court 6
- United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority 1
- United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) 9
- United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) 12
- United Kingdom: Supreme Court 2
- United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) 3
- Afghanistan 10
- Algeria 1
- Angola 1
- Australia 1
- Austria 1
- Belgium 9
- Eritrea 6
- France 5
- Germany 2
- Greece 5
- Hungary 1
- Iran, Islamic Republic of 3
- Iraq 4
- Ireland 2
- Italy 8
- Libya 2
- Malta 3
- Myanmar 2
- Netherlands 3
- Pakistan 2
- Senegal 2
- Serbia 1
- Slovenia 2
- Somalia 5
- South Africa 6
- Sri Lanka 2
- Switzerland 1
- Tunisia 1
- Turkey 1
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 27
- Viet Nam 2
|
BV (Unaccompanied Minor - Timing of Decision) Vietnam
Heard on 13 May 2004. 3 May 2004 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority | Topic(s): Reception | Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Viet Nam |
|
Decision of the Court in The Hague in Interim Injunction Proceedings (Civil Section), No. KG 03/284, on the Reception of Unaccompanied Minor Asylum Seekers (UMAs)
- 23 April 2003 | Judicial Body: Netherlands, The: The Hague District Court | Topic(s): Reception | Countries: Netherlands |
|
Evangelisches Hilfswerk v. Republic of Austria
This is an unofficial translation made by BO Vienna. The Austrian Supreme Court ("Oberster Gerichtshof"; the last instance in civil law) in a decision of 24 February 2003 (No 1 Ob 272/02k; published only on 22 April 2003) ruled that the Austrian State is obliged to accommodate and support all needy asylum seekers in Austria who co-operate in the determination of their identity. Consequently, the view of the Austrian State, according to which the authorities have discretionary power in deciding whom to accommodate and support, was rejected. Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled that NGOs who accommodated asylum seekers, who were denied State assistance, may claim reimbursement by the State for the costs related to accommodation and support of asylum seekers during the last 30(!) years. 24 February 2003 | Judicial Body: Austria: Supreme Court | Topic(s): Reception | Countries: Afghanistan - Austria |
