United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority

The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) forms part of the Tribunals Service, an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. The implementation of AIT in 2005, superseded the former Immigration Appellent Authority (IAA). The AIT hears and decides appeals against decisions made by the Home Office in matters of asylum, immigration and nationality. The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal was abolished by Article 2 of the Transfer of Functions of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal Order 2010, and its functions were transferred to the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (UTIAC), created under Part 1 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, effective 15 February 2010. Website: www.ait.gov.uk/

Narrow results by
Type
Type
- Type

Case Law 3

Selected filters: Algeria Effective protection

Filter:

Showing 1-3 of 3 results

ZS (IFA - Women) Algeria v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 13 February 2004 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Effective protection - Internal flight alternative (IFA) / Internal relocation alternative (IRA) / Internal protection alternative (IPA) - Racial / Ethnic persecution - Women-at-risk \| Countries: Algeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. AK (Threats from Salafists) Algeria 7 February 2003 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Agents of persecution - Arbitrary arrest and detention - Country of origin information (COI) - Effective protection - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - Grounds for persecution - Maternal and child health care - Public health \| Countries: Algeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Yousfi v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (1)The correct test was not whether a State had taken all reasonable steps to protect its citizens against persecution having regard to its means and resources and to the circumstances in the State at the particular time, but was whether, viewed objectively, the domestic protection offered by or available from the State to the appellant was or was not reasonably likely to prevent persecution, or alternatively, whether the State was able to provide effective protection against persecution. (2)Although persecution is normally related to action by the authorities it may also emanate from 'sections of the population' or 'local populace' that do not respect the standards established by the laws of the country concerned. 1 April 1997 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Asylum and Immigration Tribunal / Immigration Appellate Authority \| Document type: Case Law \| Legal Instrument: 1951 Refugee Convention \| Topic(s): Effective protection - Non-state agents of persecution \| Countries: Algeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips