SI, TL, ND, VH, YT, HN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling, Case C‑497/21
Article 33(2)(d) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in conjunction with Article 2(q) thereof and Article 2 of Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark annexed to the EU Treaty and to the FEU Treaty, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State other than the Kingdom of Denmark which provides for the possibility of rejecting as inadmissible, in whole or in part, an application for international protection within the meaning of Article 2(b) of that directive, which has been made to that Member State by a national of a third country or a stateless person whose previous application for international protection, made to the Kingdom of Denmark, has been rejected by the latter Member State. 22 September 2022 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Legal Instrument: 2013 Dublin III Regulation (EU) | Topic(s): Decision on admissibility - International protection - Safe third country | Countries: Denmark - Georgia - Germany |
Beschluss vom 26. Juni 2014 in der Überstellungshaftsache
26 June 2014 | Judicial Body: Germany: Bundesgerichtshof | Topic(s): Immigration Detention - Regional instruments - Safe third country | Countries: Germany - Hungary - Pakistan |
Decision of 6 June 2014
6 June 2014 | Judicial Body: Germany: Bundesverwaltungsgericht | Topic(s): Human rights law - Regional instruments - Safe third country | Countries: Germany - Italy - Morocco |
Bundesrepublik Deutschland v. Kaveh Puid
14 November 2013 | Judicial Body: European Union: Court of Justice of the European Union | Topic(s): Regional instruments - Safe third country | Countries: Germany - Greece - Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main, Urteil vom 9. Juli 2013
9 July 2013 | Judicial Body: Germany: Verwaltungsgericht | Countries: Afghanistan - Germany - Italy |
Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 24. Juni 2013
24 June 2013 | Judicial Body: Germany: Verwaltungsgericht | Countries: Germany - Iran, Islamic Republic of |
M, R (on the application of) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
6 December 2011 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Mental health - Mentally disadvantaged persons - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness - Safe third country | Countries: Sri Lanka |
RRT Case No. 1005628
21 September 2010 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - Older persons - Residence permits / Residency - Safe third country - Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) - Social group persecution - Women-at-risk | Countries: Afghanistan |
R (on the application of Michel and Others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
Applications for judicial review. 21 August 2009 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: High Court (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Asylum policy - Deportation / Forcible return - Safe third country | Countries: Sri Lanka |
Urteil vom. 29 Juni 1999 BVerwG 9 C 36.98
The case summary in English has been prepared in the framework of the Knowledge-Based Harmonisation of European Asylum Practices Project (2010-2012), co-financed by the European Refugee Fund. 29 June 1999 | Judicial Body: Germany: Bundesverwaltungsgericht | Countries: Germany - Iraq |