Last Updated: Friday, 01 November 2019, 13:47 GMT

Canada: Federal Court

The Federal Court is Canada's national trial court which hears and decides legal disputes arising in the federal domain, including claims against the Government of Canada, civil suits in federally-regulated areas and challenges to the decisions of federal tribunals. Until 2003, the Federal Court of Canada consisted of two divisions: an Appeal and a Trial Division. On 2 July 2003, these divisions became two separate courts: the Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. Website: www.fca-caf.gc.ca/index_e.shtml
Selected filters: Case Law Kenya
Filter:
Showing 1-6 of 6 results
Hashi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

19 February 2014 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Topic(s): Armed groups / Militias / Paramilitary forces / Resistance movements - Well-founded fear of persecution | Countries: Canada - Kenya - Somalia

Ndegwa v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

5 July 2006 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Topic(s): Female genital mutilation (FGM) - Persecution of family members - Social group persecution | Countries: Canada - Kenya

Ndegwa c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)

5 July 2006 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Topic(s): Female genital mutilation (FGM) - Persecution of family members - Social group persecution | Countries: Canada - Kenya

Hassan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

Heard: August 24, 1999. Judgment: September 7, 1999. (30 paras.)

7 September 1999 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Countries: Canada - Kenya

Vidhani c. Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l'Immigration)

-

8 June 1995 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Countries: Canada - Kenya

Said v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)

The applicant, a citizen of Kenya, was denied refugee status because it was held that there was no credible basis for his claim. Subsequently, the Minister of Employment and Immigration ordered a review of the unsuccessful refugee claims of individuals from Kenya to determine if they qualified for landing on compassionate and humanitarian grounds. If the claim had been rejected as having no credible basis, so that the refugee claimant had not been entitled to a hearing on the merits, the file would be reviewed to see if compassionate and humanitarian grounds existed, but claimants were not notified of the review. An immigration counsellor reviewed the applicant's file and determined that there were insufficient humanitarian and compassionate grounds to stay removal.

23 April 1992 | Judicial Body: Canada: Federal Court | Countries: Canada - Kenya

Search Refworld