The Inter-American Court of Human Rights condemns the State of Chile for having used its antiterrorist legislation against members of the Mapuche people
Publisher | International Federation for Human Rights |
Publication Date | 30 July 2014 |
Cite as | International Federation for Human Rights, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights condemns the State of Chile for having used its antiterrorist legislation against members of the Mapuche people, 30 July 2014, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/54057f6c5.html [accessed 25 December 2015] |
Disclaimer | This is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States. |
30 July 2014
Yesterday, in the case of Norin Catriman et al. vs. the State of Chile, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights found the State of Chile guilty of violating the human rights of members of the Mapuche people. FIDH welcomes this decision. The situation in Araucanía is indeed one of the main issues that President Bachelet has to address.
"The decision recognises that it is illegal to criminalize the Mapuche quests for their ancestral land" explained Jimena Reyes, head of the FIDH Latin America Bureau and one of the legal counsels in the case. "The ruling opens the path for the conviction in other cases of criminalization of social protest throughout the continent, which is unfortunately widespread", she added.
The Inter-American Court condemned the Chilean State partly because the sentences it issued against the Mapuche for their alleged crimes were based on an antiterrorism piece of legislation which violates the principle of legality and the right to the presumption of innocence.
The Inter-American Court also held that the sentences were based on stereotypes and prejudices, in violation of the principles of equality and non-discrimination. Additionally, the Court found that the trial in Argentina violated due process requirements. All these elements combined demonstrate that these convictions were arbitrary and incompatible with the American Convention.
In the case before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, FIDH along with two other attorneys represented five of the eight Mapuche victims: the two Lonkos (Mapuche spiritual leaders) Ciriaco and Pichun, as well as José Huencunao, Jaime Marileo, and Patrico Marileo; all of whom were advocating to recover land belonging to their communities and who were convicted of "terrorist threat" and "terrorist arson" in 2002 and 2003 and sentenced to long prison terms.
Following the return of democracy in Chile, the Mapuche were confronted to the repeated denials of the Court to recognize their land titles. Investment projects in forest operations, in hydroelectric installations, and in roads were implemented without prior consultation and contributed to stripping the Mapuche of their land. This led them to organise public protests to defend their rights. As of 1992, authorities started to criminalise their protests. In particular in 2001, authorities started to selectively and discriminatorily apply the Anti-Terrorist Act against the Mapuche leaders and members. The aim was to weaken social protests and demonstrations for the recovery of ancestral lands.
"FIDH welcomes this momentous decision and expresses its concern over the extensive violations of economic, social, and cultural rights that affect communities in Latin America, in particular indigenous communities" said Karim Lahidji, FIDH President.
Last Update 5 August