United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)

The Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (UTIAC) is a superior court of record and forms part of the Tribunals Service, an executive agency of the Ministry of Justice. Its purpose is to hear and decide appeals against decisions made by the First-tier Tribunal in matters of immigration, asylum and nationality. Appeals are heard by one or more Senior or Designated Immigration Judges who are sometimes accompanied by non legal members of the Tribunal. Immigration Judges and non legal members are appointed by the Lord Chancellor and together they form an independent judicial body. The former Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) was superseded by the implementation of the UTIAC in February 2010. Website: www.tribunals.gov.uk/immigrationasylum/utiac/index.htm

Narrow results by
Type
Country
Type
- Type
- Country

Case Law 28

Afghanistan 1
China 1
Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1
Gambia 2
India 4
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1
Iraq 3
Lithuania 1
Malaysia 2
Nepal 1
Nigeria 4
Pakistan 3
Palestine, State of 1
Syrian Arab Republic 1
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 28
Viet Nam 1
Zimbabwe 2

Selected filters: Deportation / Forcible return

Filter:

Showing 11-20 of 27 results

JS (Former unaccompanied child – durable solution) Afghanistan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 29 August 2013 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life - Unaccompanied / Separated children \| Countries: Afghanistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v. Akhalu (health claim: ECHR Article 8) 24 July 2013 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Countries: Nigeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
RS (immigration/family court liaison: outcome) v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department 31 January 2013 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life \| Countries: India - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Cuong Van Dang v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department 17 January 2013 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - National security / Public order - Non-refoulement - Regional instruments \| Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Viet Nam
KB (Failed asylum seekers and forced returnees) Syria CG v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 20 December 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Denial of refugee status - Deportation / Forcible return - Persecution based on political opinion \| Countries: Syrian Arab Republic - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
MF (Article 8 - new rules) Nigeria v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 31 October 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life \| Countries: Nigeria - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Jaff (s.120 notice; statement of "additional grounds") [2012] UKUT 00396 (i) In the absence of a s.120 notice and a statement of "additional grounds", an appellant could not rely on the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 before the First-tier Tribunal as that had not formed part of his application for leave to remain made to the Secretary of State: Lamichhane v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 260 applied. (ii) A statement of "additional grounds" may be made in response to a s.120 notice at any time, including up to (and perhaps at the time of) the hearing of the appeal. (iii) Although the legislative scheme prescribes no particular form in which a statement of "additional grounds" must be made, such a statement must as a minimum set out with some level of particularity the ground(s) relied upon by the appellant as the foundation for remaining in the UK and upon which reliance has not previously been placed. It must "state" the additional ground to be relied on in substance or, at least, in form. 10 September 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life \| Countries: Iraq - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Ahmad and others (removal of children over 18) v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department 28 July 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Children's rights - Deportation / Forcible return - Immigrants \| Countries: Pakistan - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
RS (immigration and family court proceedings) India v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department 20 June 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life \| Countries: India - United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Article 8 - in accordance with the law) Zimbabwe 2 February 2012 \| Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law \| Topic(s): Deportation / Forcible return - Right to family life \| Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - Zimbabwe

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips