Adjudication of asylum claims (refugee status determination / asylum procedures) / One-child policy / Family planning

Afghanistan 4
Algeria 1
Australia 19
Azerbaijan 2
Bangladesh 3
Belarus 2
Burundi 2
Canada 1
Central African Republic 2
Chad 2
China 111
Colombia 1
Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3
Congo, Republic of the 2
Côte d'Ivoire 3
Egypt 3
Eritrea 3
Ghana 1
Guinea 2
India 1
Indonesia 1
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3
Iraq 3
Ireland 1
Israel 3
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 1
Mali 2
Morocco 1
Myanmar 3
Nepal 3
New Zealand 2
Nigeria 3
Pakistan 3
Palestine, State of 1
Philippines 2
Rwanda 2
Senegal 1
Serbia 2
Sierra Leone 1
Somalia 3
South Africa 1
South Sudan 2
Syrian Arab Republic 3
Tanzania, United Republic of 2
Tunisia 1
Turkey 2
Ukraine 3
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2
United States of America 20
Viet Nam 2
Yemen 3

Filter:

Showing 71-80 of 144 results

AX (family planning scheme) China v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 13 April 2012 \| Publisher: United Kingdom: Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) \| Document type: Case Law
RRT Case No. 1108245 1 March 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Case Law
RRT Case No. 1109018 4 January 2012 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Case Law
Operational Guidance Note: China 11 October 2011 \| Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office \| Document type: Country Reports
Senegal: "Small revolution" in family planning 26 September 2011 \| Publisher: IRIN \| Document type: Country News
Country of Origin Information Report - China 24 August 2011 \| Publisher: United Kingdom: Home Office \| Document type: Country Reports
China: 1. XUAR is an autonomous region. Does the one-child policy apply in XUAR? 2. Is it possible to transfer household registration from Fujian to XUAR? 24 June 2011 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Are there any reported instances of selective enforcement of the PFP Law? 2. Are there any reported instances of unduly harsh punishment for breaches of the PFP Law? 3. Are Hebei Population and Family Planning implementation details (Promulgated 14 September 2004, Effective 1 November 2004) and Hebei Population and Family Planning Ordinance (Promulgated 18 July 2003, Effective 1 October 2003) still current? 29 April 2011 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. Are there any reported instances of selective enforcement of the PFP Law? 2. Are there any reported instances of unduly harsh punishment for breaches of the PFP Law? 3. Are Hebei Population and Family Planning implementation details (Promulgated 14 September 2004, Effective 1 November 2004) and Hebei Population and Family Planning Ordinance (Promulgated 18 July 2003, Effective 1 October 2003) still current? 4. Deleted. 29 April 2011 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses
China: 1. If the children of Chinese nationals are born overseas, do the children automatically have Chinese nationality, or is it necessary for them to be registered in order to obtain nationality? 2. CX252081 indicates that there is currently an amnesty on household registration for children born out of wedlock. What treatment would such children now face if they returned to China? 3. Would a second child also born in Australia be exempt from the family planning laws if both parents were students? 27 April 2011 \| Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal \| Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld

by keyword

and / or country

Advanced Search | Search Tips