Last Updated: Friday, 06 January 2017, 10:25 GMT

Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal

The Refugee Review Tribunal was a statutory body which provided a final, independent, merits review of decisions made by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship or, in practice, by officers of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), acting as delegates of the Minister, to refuse to grant protection visas to non-citizens within Australia, or to cancel protection visas held by non-citizens in Australia. The Tribunal was established in 1993 under Part 7 of the Act and replaced the Refugee Status Review Committee (RSRC). On 1 July 2015 the Refugee Review Tribunal was amalgamated into the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.  Website: www.aat.gov.au/
Selected filters: Sufi
Filter:
Showing 1-2 of 2 results
Sudan: 1. Is there any information to indicate that doctors or other medical practitioners in Sudan are being - or have been - targeted for harm by Sudanese authorities? 2. Please provide summary information on the Sudanese medical system, including the ability of those in need of medical treatment to obtain access to necessary services; the standard of medical treatment provided; and the standard of medical training and infrastructure in the country. 3. Please provide information on the current government in Sudan and its stance towards opposition parties and whether there is government sponsored harm towards opponents. 4. Please provide information about the Sudanese Federal Democratic party. 5. Please provide information about freedom of religion in Sudan. 6. Please provide information about the attitude of the Sudanese government towards Sufism. 7. Please provide any information about the treatment of returnees from the West and failed asylum seekers.

4 January 2012 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Pakistan: 1. Please provide information, if any, on Rokhana Seema - when it was established, where, by whom, its aims, etc. 2. Has this organisation been targeted by TNSM? 3. Are there any reports suggesting that TNSM has harmed individuals or groups advocating and/or defending women's rights? 4. What has been the extent of TNSM's activities after it was banned in 2002? 5. What has been the extent of TNSM's activities outside of NWFP?

21 March 2006 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld