|
AFFAIRE A.E.A. c. GRÈCE (Requête no 39034/12)
The possibility of introducing an asylum claim is a conditio sine qua non for the effective protection of persons in need of international protection. If authorities do not guarantee unhindered access to the asylum procedure, asylum-seekers can not make use of the procedural rights foreseen within the asylum procedure and are at risk of being arrested at any time. Hence even if the asylum procedure offers effective safeguards, these are of no use if, as in the present case, the asylum claim is not registered for a long period of time. [85] violation of article 13 (effective remedy) in combination with article 3 ECHR. 15 March 2018 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Legal Instrument: 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Effective protection - Effective remedy - Registration | Countries: Egypt - Greece - Sudan - Türkiye |
|
R.U. c. Grèce
7 June 2011 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Kurd | Countries: Greece - Türkiye |
|
Esref Cakmak c. Turquie
15 February 2011 | Judicial Body: Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Criminal justice - Military service / Conscientious objection / Desertion / Draft evasion / Forced conscription | Countries: Türkiye |
|
NB (Guinea) and ZD (Turkey) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
On appeal from the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AA/09921/2006 & AA/09820/2005). 13 November 2008 | Judicial Body: United Kingdom: Court of Appeal (England and Wales) | Topic(s): Access to procedures - Administrative courts - Appeal / Right to appeal - Criminal justice - Independence of judiciary - Rule of law / Due process / Procedural fairness | Countries: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
