On 14 March 2018, the Supreme Court of Ukraine established the fact that forced displacement in July 2014 of the applicants in a case from the “occupied part of the Luhansk region” occurred as a result of the “armed aggression” of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the occupation of the part of the Luhansk region by the Russian Federation. Both the first instance court and the court of appeal rejected the application indicating that the establishment of such reasons for internal displacement and its further clarification into a legal fact do not fall under the competence of the court of general jurisdiction. The Supreme Court decided to establish a clear link between the “widely known and accepted fact of the Russian aggression” and the forced displacement.
Administrative cases; Cases on disputes over the implementation of public policies in the
areas of labour, employment and social protection of citizens and disputes in the area of
public housing policy, namely, disputes regarding: management, supervision and other
administrative functions (assignment, recalculation and implementation of insurance
benefits) in the area of the corresponding types of obligatory state social insurance,
including: obligatory state pension insurance, including pension insurance for persons
dismissed from the public service (military service)
(i) What are the likely punishments for draft evasion in Ukraine
(ii) Are prison conditions for draft evaders in Ukraine contrary to Article 3 of ECHR, or has there been a significant and durable change in Ukraine such that the country guidance decision of PS (prison conditions; military service) CG [2006] UKAIT 00016 should no longer be followed?