Last Updated: Thursday, 06 October 2022, 15:48 GMT
Refworld Home
Latest Refworld Updates for Australia RSS feed

Australia - flag Australia

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of non-UNHCR websites. Content displays in a new window.

Filter:
Showing 11-20 of 21 results
RRT Case No. 1003429

4 August 2010 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - Christian - Credibility assessment - Freedom from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment - One-child policy / Family planning - Persecution based on political opinion - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0905355

31 January 2010 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Credibility assessment - Falun Gong - One-child policy / Family planning - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Social group persecution - Statelessness - Statelessness | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0903266

18 September 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): One-child policy / Family planning - Sexual and reproductive rights - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0901642

3 June 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children's rights - Christian - Economic, social and cultural rights - Illegitimate children - One-child policy / Family planning - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Sexual and reproductive rights - Social group persecution - Statelessness - Statelessness | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0901671

2 June 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Catholic - Children's rights - Children-at-risk - Christian - Country of origin information (COI) - Grounds for persecution - Illegitimate children - One-child policy / Family planning - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Sexual and reproductive rights | Countries: Australia - China

SZNCK v. Minister for Immigration & Anor

Application for judicial review.

28 May 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Magistrates Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Country of origin information (COI) - One-child policy / Family planning - Right to employment - Social group discrimination - Social group persecution - Well-founded fear of persecution | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0805331

30 April 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Children-at-risk - Christian - Falun Gong - One-child policy / Family planning - Persecution based on political opinion - Persecution of family members - Refugee status determination (RSD) / Asylum procedures - Religious persecution (including forced conversion) - Right to registration at birth - Social group persecution - Statelessness | Countries: Australia - China

SZJRU v. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

6 April 2009 | Judicial Body: Australia: Federal Court | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): One-child policy / Family planning - Sexual and reproductive rights - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - China

RRT Case No. 0801613

17 June 2008 | Judicial Body: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Case Law | Topic(s): Arbitrary arrest and detention - One-child policy / Family planning - Right to education - Social group persecution | Countries: Australia - China

China: I would like to get up-to-date information on the application of family planning regulations in Shandong province, firstly in relation to the impact on parents who have breached the family planning regulations and secondly in relation to the impact on the children. For example, in relation to the parents: 1. What are the penalties imposed on parents for having out-of-plan children? 2. Are these penalties imposed in practice? 3. Is there any procedure for having them waived / reduced? 4. Would the fact that the children have been born outside of China make any difference to action taken against the parents? (NB. These parents did not come to Australia as students). In relation to the child: 5. Could she get registration? 6. If so, would she suffer any penalty for having been born out-of-plan? 7. If she was considered a "black child", what would be the impact of being unregistered on her access to education, health care and so forth? 8. Any other information of relevance would be appreciated

7 September 2005 | Publisher: Australia: Refugee Review Tribunal | Document type: Query Responses

Search Refworld

Advanced Search | Search Tips
UNHCR logo