• Text size Normal size text | Increase text size by 10% | Increase text size by 20% | Increase text size by 30%

Kosovo minorities still need international protection, says UNHCR

News Stories, 24 August 2004

© UNHCR/T.Buckenmeyer
A destroyed house in Svinjare/Frasier, a mixed village in Kosovo. The March 2004 riots underline the fragile nature of inter-ethnic relations in the restive region.

GENEVA, Aug 24 (UNHCR) The UN refugee agency today advised asylum countries that members of Kosovo's minority communities, as well as some other vulnerable groups, are still in need of international protection and should not be returned against their will, even if their asylum claims are rejected.

Nor is it appropriate to send them into alternative displacement in other parts of Serbia and Montenegro, according to a separate UNHCR position paper issued simultaneously with the protection advice and a detailed 62-page report on the situation of minorities in Kosovo during the period January 2003 to April 2004.

The report contains a list of 145 separate incidents excluding the major period of civil unrest that took place in mid-March of this year, which is covered by a separate appendix. Incidents apparently targeted at members of minorities range from stone-throwing to a number of brutal murders and other extremely violent assaults, involving shooting, grenade attacks and arson.

In general, the report says, the number of such incidents aimed at members of the Roma, Ashkaelia, Egyptian, Bosniak and Gorani minorities was declining during the period January 2003 to early March 2004. However, this positive trend was shattered by several killings of Kosovo Serbs during the second half of 2003 and the first few months of 2004. In all, 12 Kosovo Serbs were murdered between January and November 2003, compared to five during the whole of 2002.

A number of the most shocking incidents, including killings, were perpetrated against elderly Serbs: On May 21, 2003, for example, a 90-year-old Serb man was severely beaten by four Albanian youths, and hospitalised with severe head injuries. Two weeks later, a Serb couple aged 80 and 78 were murdered in their beds along with their 53-year-old son. Then their house was burned down. Both guns and a heavy blunt instrument were used in the killings.

On August 17, an 81-year-old Serb woman was treated in hospital after being sexually assaulted. Three months later, the same woman was hit by a car, apparently deliberately, in front of the local UNMIK building. In October, a 75-year-old Serb woman died in hospital after being shot four times by an Albanian man illegally occupying her house. And on November 8, a 70-year-old Serb was assaulted by six people while working in his fields. After being badly beaten, he was stuffed in a sack and thrown in the river. Miraculously, he survived after being rescued and taken to hospital with head injuries.

Examples of attacks on other minority groups include an Ashkaelia family who were attacked for the ninth time, when a grenade was thrown in their garden on July 21, 2003, and a Roma boy who was attacked by an unknown assailant who poured gasoline on his face, and set him on fire. Albanians living in Serb-dominated areas in parts of northern Kosovo, including the divided city of Mitrovice/a, also suffered a number of violent attacks.

The fragile nature of the decrease in inter-ethnic tensions in recent years was fully exposed by the unexpected explosion of violence that began on March 17, 2004 and continued for three full days before being brought under control. In all during this brief period, 20 people were killed, and more than 950 were injured. Initial assessments estimated that at least 730 houses or apartments belonging to minorities were damaged or destroyed, as well as 36 churches, monasteries, other religious sites and public buildings catering for minorities.

The violence spread rapidly to all regions of Kosovo resulting in displacement among all minority communities. By March 23, a total of more than 4,100 Serb, Roma, Ashkaelia, Egyptian and Albanian minority community members had been displaced. About 2,300 of them are still displaced five months later. Although not directly targeted, some Bosniaks and Gorani also felt sufficiently at risk to leave their homes as a precaution, or were evacuated by police to safer places.

On a more positive note, the report cites some examples where majority Albanian communities actively intervened to prevent attacks on minorities.

In the light of all this information, UNHCR concludes that there is clearly a continued need for international protection for asylum seekers belonging to Kosovo minority groups, especially Serbs, Roma, Ashkaelia and Egyptians. A few selected groups of Kosovo Albanians are also in need of international protection, including those in mixed marriages and some perceived to have been associated with the Serbian regime prior to 1999, in addition to those living as minorities in some parts of northern Kosovo.

UNHCR is aware of a number of Bosniaks, Ashkaelians and Egyptians who have been sent back, against their will, by several European countries. There have even been a few cases of Serbs and Roma the two groups most at risk being returned involuntarily. Some of those returned in this manner have subsequently moved away to neighbouring countries.

During the March disturbances, some Ashkaelian forced returnees had to be evacuated along with the rest of their community, after two mobs descended on their neighbourhood. One mob burned down the church and desecrated the cemetery, then joined the other which was looting the Ashkaelian houses. After the Ashkaelians were evacuated, 67 of their houses were burned.

In the position paper on international protection needs, UNHCR has also highlighted its view that individuals in a particularly vulnerable situation for example people with severe physical or mental illnesses and some categories of elderly people and separated children should not be returned by states, given the inadequate standards of health care and social welfare situations available in Kosovo.

UNHCR for the first time issued a separate position paper addressing the question of whether or not members of Kosovo minorities could be sent back to other parts of Serbia and Montenegro, and said that it believed the implementation of such returns would not be reasonable except in exceptional cases when justified by the individual circumstances of the person concerned.

In coming to this conclusion, the agency cites the serious legal difficulties facing displaced people from Kosovo in other parts of Serbia and Montenegro, including those already living there as internally displaced people (IDPs). These are particularly acute in the case of people from Kosovo who are forcibly returned from third countries, including ones where they have sought asylum. In addition, many of the 220,000 Kosovo IDPs already in Serbia and Montenegro are facing considerable hardship. IDPs from the Roma, Ashkaelia and Egyptian minorities are often marginalised, or actively discriminated against, and unable to find employment.

Finally, the UNHCR paper reminds asylum countries considering the forced return of people from Kosovo to other parts of Serbia and Montenegro, that UN Security Council Resolution 1244, of June 10, 1999, talks specifically of assuring the safe and unimpeded return of all refugees and displaced persons "to their homes in Kosovo."

The UNHCR paper also says that the "denial of refugee status on the basis of the internal flight or relocation concept may be interpreted as condoning the new ethnic reality on the ground, and hence negatively impact on the safe and unimpeded return to their homes of those minority members who wish to do so."

Nevertheless, while confidence in the fragile minority return process has clearly been damaged by the violent rioting in March, small scale voluntary return of minorities is continuing, and UNHCR continues to support such voluntary returns to Kosovo, provided they are based on a free and informed decision by the individuals concerned. A total of nearly 11,000 minority members have returned to their homes since 1999, including more than 3,800 last year. About 1,030 have returned so far in 2004, which would suggest the yearly total will be much lower than in 2003.

Most Serbs who have returned have done so to exclusively Serb communities rather than to mixed ones.

• DONATE NOW •

 

• GET INVOLVED • • STAY INFORMED •

Prominent Refugees

An A-Z of refugee achievers around the world.

The 1951 Refugee Convention and 1967 Protocol

The most frequently asked questions about the treaty and its protocol.

Refugees: Telling Their Stories

A publication of the winners & finalists of UNHCR's High School Writing Competition

[PDF, 40pp. 1.2Mb]

Refugee Women

Women and girls make up about 50 percent of the world's refugee population, and they are clearly the most vulnerable. At the same time, it is the women who carry out the crucial tasks in refugee camps – caring for their children, participating in self-development projects, and keeping their uprooted families together.

To honour them and to draw attention to their plight, the High Commissioner for Refugees decided to dedicate World Refugee Day on June 20, 2002, to women refugees.

The photographs in this gallery show some of the many roles uprooted women play around the world. They vividly portray a wide range of emotions, from the determination of Macedonian mothers taking their children home from Kosovo and the hope of Sierra Leonean girls in a Guinean camp, to the tears of joy from two reunited sisters. Most importantly, they bring to life the tremendous human dignity and courage of women refugees even in the most difficult of circumstances.

Refugee Women

Zero-Star "Hotel" that Asylum-Seekers Call Home in Dijon

France is one of the main destinations for asylum-seekers in Europe, with some 55,000 new asylum applications in 2012. As a result of the growing number of applicants, many French cities are facing an acute shortage of accommodation for asylum-seekers.

The government is trying to address the problem and, in February 2013, announced the creation of 4,000 additional places in state-run reception centres for asylum-seekers. But many asylum-seekers are still forced to sleep rough or to occupy empty buildings. One such building, dubbed the "Refugee Hotel" by its transient population, lies on the outskirts of the eastern city of Dijon. It illustrates the critical accommodation situation.

The former meat-packing plant is home to about 100 asylum-seekers, mostly from Chad, Mali and Somalia, but also from Georgia, Kosovo and other Eastern European countries. Most are single men, but there are also two families.

In this dank, rat-infested empty building, the pipes leak and the electricity supply is sporadic. There is only one lavatory, two taps with running water, no bathing facilities and no kitchen. The asylum-seekers sleep in the former cold-storage rooms. The authorities have tried to close the squat several times. These images, taken by British photographer Jason Tanner, show the desperate state of the building and depict the people who call it home.

Zero-Star "Hotel" that Asylum-Seekers Call Home in Dijon

A Place to Call Home(Part 2): 1996 - 2003

This gallery highlights the history of UNHCR's efforts to help some of the world's most disenfranchised people to find a place called home, whether through repatriation, resettlement or local integration.

After decades of hospitality after World War II, as the global political climate changed and the number of people cared for by UNHCR swelled from around one million in 1951, to more than 27 million people in the mid-1990s, the welcome mat for refugees was largely withdrawn.

Voluntary repatriation has become both the preferred and only practical solution for today's refugees. In fact, the great majority of them choose to return to their former homes, though for those who cannot do so for various reasons, resettlement in countries like the United States and Australia, and local integration within regions where they first sought asylum, remain important options.

This gallery sees Rwandans returning home after the 1994 genocide; returnees to Kosovo receiving reintegration assistance; Guatemalans obtaining land titles in Mexico; and Afghans flocking home in 2003 after decades in exile.

A Place to Call Home(Part 2): 1996 - 2003